Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 4;64(7):1985–2005. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05568-9

Table 1.

Design and quality assessment of included studies

Study Year Country Follow-up design Single or multicenter Index hospitalization period of source cohort Study AP populationa Type of comparison Follow-up time (months)b Quality score
Braganza et al. 1973 UK Prospective cohort Single NR NR None > 3 NOS, 6
Seligson et al. 1982 Sweden Prospective cohort Single 1969–1978 Severec None 59 (18–108) NOS, 5
Mitchell et al. 1983 UK Prospective cohort Single NR All severity Index admission versus follow-up; mild versus severe; biliary versus alcohol Index admission, 2–12 NOS, 6
Angelini et al. 1984 Italy Prospective cohort Single NR Severec Biliary versus alcohol 13–36 NOS, 5
Arenas et al. 1986 Spain Prospective cohort Singe NR All severity Index admission versus follow-up; biliary versus alcohol Index admission, 1 NOS, 4
Büchler et al. 1987 Germany Prospective cohort Single 1981 to 1985 All severity Edematous versus necrotizing; biliary versus alcohol 2–12, 13–40 NOS, 6
Garnacho Montero et al. 1989 Spain Prospective cohort Single NR All severity; biliary and alcohol Index admission versus follow-up; biliary versus alcohol Index admission, 3–12 NOS, 6
Airely et al. 1991 UK Prospective RCT Single NR Mildc Index admission versus follow-up; placebo versus PERT Index admission, 1.5 Jadad, 3
Glasbrenner et al. 1992 Germany Prospective cohort Single NR Mildc Index admission versus follow-up; biliary versus alcohol Index admission, 1.5 NOS, 5
Bozkurt et al. 1995 Germany Prospective cohort Single NR IPN None 3–12, 18 NOS, 5
Seidensticker et al. 1995 Germany Prospective cohort Single 1976 to 1992 All severity Biliary versus alcohol < 12, 12–60, > 60 NOS, 5
Malecka-Panas et al. (a) 1996 Poland Prospective cohort Single NR Severec; alcohol None 48–84 NOS, 4
Malecka-Panas et al. (b) 1996 Poland Prospective cohort Single NR All severity; biliary None 6–12; 36–60 NOS, 4
John et al. 1997 South Africa Prospective consecutive cohort Single NR All severity None 9 (2–16) NOS, 4
Tsiotos et al. 1998 USA Prospective cohort Single 1983 to 1995 IPN None 48 (3–132) NOS, 5
Appelros et al. 2001 Sweden Prospective cohort Single 1985 and 1994 Severec None 84 (24–144) NOS, 4
Ibars et al. 2002 Spain Prospective cohort Single July 1994 to December 1995 All severity; biliary Mild versus severe 6–12 NOS, 6
Boreham et al. 2003 UK Prospective cohort Single December 2000 to November 2001 All severity Index admission versus follow-up; mild versus severe Index admission, 3 NOS, 7
Napolitano et al. 2003 Italy Prospective cohort Single NR Mildc; biliary None 48 NOS, 7
Sabater et al. 2004 Spain Prospective cohort Single 1994 to 1998 Severe (included a proportion of IPN)c; biliary Conservative versus necrosectomy 12 NOS, 8
Migliori et al. 2004 Italy Prospective cohort Single NR All severity; biliary and alcohol Edematous versus necrotizing; biliary versus alcohol 18 NOS, 6
Bavare et al. 2004 India Prospective consecutive cohort Single January 2001 to June 2003 IPN Index admission versus follow-up Index admission, 6–12, 13–18 NOS, 5
Symersky et al. 2006 Netherlands Prospective cohort Single 1990 to 1996 All severity; nonalcoholic Mild versus severe 55 (12–90) NOS, 4
Reszetow et al. 2007 Poland Prospective consecutive cohort Single January 1993 to December 1999 IPN; biliary and alcohol Biliary versus alcohol; female versus male 61 (24–96) NOS, 5
Reddy et al. 2007 India Prospective consecutive cohort Single 1996 to 1998 IPN Biliary versus alcohol; female versus male 22 (15–36) NOS, 5
Pelli et al. 2009 Finland Prospective cohort Single January 2001 to February 2004 All severity, alcoholic Index admission versus follow-up; mild versus severe Index admission, 24 NOS, 5
Pezzilli et al. 2009 Italy Prospective consecutive cohort Single January 2006 to December 2006 All severity Mild versus severe; biliary versus alcohol; female versus male Index admission NOS, 3
Gupta et al. 2009 India Prospective cohort Single July 2005 to December 2006 (and prior to 2005) Severe (included a proportion of IPN)c Conservative versus necrosectomy 31 (7–118) NOS, 4
Uomo et al. 2010 Italy Prospective consecutive cohort Single January 1994 to December 2006 Severec None 180 (156–203) NOS, 6
Andersson et al. 2010 Sweden Prospective cohort Single 2001–2005 All severity Mild versus severe 42 (36–53) NOS, 8
Xu et al. 2012 China Prospective consecutive cohort Single 2003 to 2008 All severity Mild versus severe 29 NOS, 7
Garip et al. 2013 Turkey Prospective consecutive cohort Single March 2003 to October 2007 All severity Mild versus severe; edematous versus necrotizing 32 (6–48) NOS, 6
Kahl et al. 2014 Germany Prospective RCT Multicenter NR All severity Placebo versus PERT Index admission Jadad, 4
Vujasinovic et al. 2014 Slovenia Prospective cohort Multicenter NR All severity Mild versus severe (mild versus moderate versus severed); biliary versus alcohol; female versus male 32 NOS, 5
Winter Gasparoto et al. 2015 Brazil Prospective consecutive cohort Single January 2002 to April 2012 Severec None 35 (12–90) NOS, 4
Chandrasekaran et al. 2015 India Prospective cohort Single July 2009 to December 2010 Severe (included a proportion of IPN)c Conservative versus necrosectomy 26 ± 18 NOS, 8
Ermolov et al. 2016 Russia Prospective cohort Single 2003 to 2012 Severe (included a proportion of IPN)c Conservative versus necrosectomy 102 ± 36 NOS, 6
Nikkola et al. 2017 Finland Prospective cohort Single January 2001 to February 2005 All severity; alcoholic Mild versus severed 126 (37–155) NOS, 5
Koziel et al. 2017 Poland Prospective cohort Single 2011 and 2012 Mild and severe Mild versus severe (mild versus moderate to severed); biliary versus alcohol 14 ± 4 NOS, 8
Tu et al. 2017 China Prospective cohort Single January 2016 to April 2016 All severity (included a proportion of IPN) Mild versus moderate versus severed 43 ± 4 NOS, 5
van Brunschot et al. 2018 Netherland Prospective RCT Multicenter September 2011 to January 2015 Infected pancreatic necrosis Endoscopic versus surgical step up approach 6 Jadad, 5

AP acute pancreatitis, NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, NR not reported, RCT randomized controlled trial, PERT pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, IPN infected pancreatic necrosis and/or unresolving sterile necrosis that needed necrosectomy and became infected

aIncluded all etiologies if not otherwise stated

bIndex admission refers to between the start of oral refeeding and before discharge

cSevere was defined by original Atlanta classification or the authors own clinical criteria

dSevere was defined by the revised Atlanta classification