Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;10(10):2153–2160. doi: 10.7150/jca.26719

Table 3.

Associations between BARD1 SNPs and NB Risk

Cases(N=339) Controls(N=778) P Adjusted ORa (95%CI)
No. (%) No. (%)
rs17489363
GG 206 61.0 529 68.9 1.00
GA 114 33.7 217 28.3 0.03 1.26 (0.95-1.68)
AA 18 5.3 22 2.9 0.035 2.04 (1.06-3.92)
rs34732883
TT 197 61.2 504 68.3 1.00
CT 109 33.9 212 28.7 0.082 1.24(0.93-1.66)
CC 16 5.0 22 3.0 0.088 1.81(0.93-3.56)
rs1129804
CC 135 39.8 302 39.8 1.00
CG 163 48.1 254 46.6 0.84 1.08 (0.81-1.43)
GG 42 12.1 103 13.6 0.78 0.98(0.64-1.51)
rs2229571
CC 67 20.0 232 30.1 1.00
CG 164 49.0 370 48 <0.0001 1.74 (1.24-2.44)
GG 104 31.0 169 21.9 <0.0001 1.84 (1.37-2.49)
rs3738888
CC 323 95.3 749 97.7 1.00
CT 16 4.7 18 2.4 0.041 2.17 (1.04-4.50)
TT - - - - - - -
rs1048108
CC 147 43.6 307 39.8 1.00
CT 154 45.7 369 47.9 0.60 0.93(0.70-1.23)
TT 36 10.7 95 12.3 0.39 0.83(0.55-1.27)
rs3768716
AA 211 63.0 555 71.8 1.00
AG 111 33.1 200 25.9 0.014 1.49 (1.12-1.99)
GG 13 3.9 18 2.3 0.26 1.53 (0.73-3.21)
rs6435862
TT 232 68.8 594 76.9 1.00
GT 96 28.5 168 21.8 0.029 1.40(1.04-1.90)
GG 9 2.7 10 1.3 0.13 2.05(0.81-5.18)
rs3768707
CC 183 54.6 499 64.4 1.00
CT 132 39.4 242 31.4 0.013 1.45(1.10-1.92)
TT 20 6.0 31 4.0 0.18 1.73(0.95-3.15)
rs17487792
CC 209 64.7 545 72.4 1.00
CT 104 32.2 192 25.5 0.04 1.45(1.08-1.95)
TT 10 3.1 16 2.1 0.52 1.31(0.58-2.95)
rs7587476
CC 179 54.9 343 59.5 1.00
CT 126 38.6 206 35.8 0.59 1.04(0.77-1.41)
TT 21 6.4 27 4.7 0.32 1.37(0.74-2.56)

aData were calculated by logistic regression analysis with adjustment for sex and age as covariate