Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 18;4:24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.nbscr.2017.09.002

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Analysis of the metabolic parameters RER (left), locomotor activity (middle) and heat production (right) of the animals inside the metabolic cages during TRF. Whilst in the metabolic cages animals remained on their assigned diet composition and TRF conditions. (a) Difference within metabolic parameters between light and dark phase for the chow fed groups. (b) Difference within metabolic parameters between light and dark phase for the fcHFHS fed groups. (c) Average 24 hour values of the metabolic parameters for all diet composition and TRF groups. Data are depicted as means ± SEM. ns = non significant, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, n = 10–11 per group. Identical letters indicate similar mean values, Tukey’s Multiple Comparison post-hoc test was performed to correct for multiple testing. Locomotor activity is presented as arbitrary units (AU). ad lib = ad libitum fed animals, L = light fed animals, D = dark fed animals.