Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;2:218. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0437-z

Table 1.

Evaluation table for different subsets of the KLH micrographs

Mic. pairs Trained for AUC Precision Recall IOU
Low defocus 65 All views 0.97 0.92 0.96 0.94
14 All views 0.95 0.93 0.9 0.94
7 All views 0.97 0.89 0.94 0.92
4 All views 0.94 0.84 0.94 0.92
2 All views 0.92 0.86 0.91 0.92
1 All views 0.9 0.85 0.9 0.89
14 Side views 0.91 0.89 0.89 0.92
High defocus 65 All views 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.95
14 All views 0.97 0.91 0.99 0.95
7 All views 0.98 0.92 0.96 0.94
4 All views 0.96 0.98 0.87 0.94
2 All views 0.9 0.86 0.95 0.94
1 All views 0.91 0.85 0.91 0.91
14 Side views 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.95

The AUC, Precision, Recall, and IOU were evaluated for various training sets comprising a different number of micrograph pairs. In addition, a subset with 14 micrographs was trained to pick only side views. The IOU and the AUC values of all experiments are between 0.89 and 0.97