Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 12;11:133. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00133

Table 4.

Unadjusted and adjusted models for the association between balance status and fall rates with 95% confidence intervals.

IRR model 1 IRR model 2 IRR model 3 IRR model 4
Balance status
Poor balance 2.797 (1.684–4.645)∗∗∗ 2.124 (1.226–3.680)∗∗ 1.983 (1.134–3.466) 2.076 (1.168–3.690)
Fair balance 1.913 (1.136–3.221) 1.658 (0.974–2.823) 1.519 (0.884–2.610) 1.360 (0.772–2.396)
Good balance 1 1 1 1
Conceptual ability 1.051 (1.020–1.082)∗∗ 1.053 (1.022–1.084)∗∗ 1.048 (1.016–1.081)∗∗
Education 1.075 (1.015–1.138) 1.079 (1.018–1.143) 1.105 (1.040–1.174)∗∗
Age 0.980 (0.937–1.025) 0.995 (0.949–1.043) 0.976 (0.929–1.026)
Contrast sensitivity 1.193 (1.035–1.375) 1.226 (1.055–1.426)∗∗
Proprioception 1.051 (0.913–1.211) 1.059 (0.917–1.224)
ANT executive network 1.000 (0.997–1.004)
iCSRT_RT 1.003 (1.001–1.005)∗∗

IRR, incidence rate ratios; p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, p < 0.10. Balance status, groups categorized by sway tertiles; conceptual ability, number of trials required to shift first set in WCST; contrast sensitivity, Melbourne Edge Test; Proprioception, Knee joint position sense; iCSRT_RT, reaction time component of inhibitory choice stepping reaction time task, a test of combined inhibitory control and rapid step initiation.