Table 4.
IRR model 1 | IRR model 2 | IRR model 3 | IRR model 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance status | ||||
Poor balance | 2.797 (1.684–4.645)∗∗∗ | 2.124 (1.226–3.680)∗∗ | 1.983 (1.134–3.466)∗ | 2.076 (1.168–3.690)∗ |
Fair balance | 1.913 (1.136–3.221)∗ | 1.658 (0.974–2.823)∧ | 1.519 (0.884–2.610) | 1.360 (0.772–2.396) |
Good balance | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Conceptual ability | 1.051 (1.020–1.082)∗∗ | 1.053 (1.022–1.084)∗∗ | 1.048 (1.016–1.081)∗∗ | |
Education | 1.075 (1.015–1.138)∗ | 1.079 (1.018–1.143)∗ | 1.105 (1.040–1.174)∗∗ | |
Age | 0.980 (0.937–1.025) | 0.995 (0.949–1.043) | 0.976 (0.929–1.026) | |
Contrast sensitivity | 1.193 (1.035–1.375)∗ | 1.226 (1.055–1.426)∗∗ | ||
Proprioception | 1.051 (0.913–1.211) | 1.059 (0.917–1.224) | ||
ANT executive network | 1.000 (0.997–1.004) | |||
iCSRT_RT | 1.003 (1.001–1.005)∗∗ |
IRR, incidence rate ratios; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∧p < 0.10. Balance status, groups categorized by sway tertiles; conceptual ability, number of trials required to shift first set in WCST; contrast sensitivity, Melbourne Edge Test; Proprioception, Knee joint position sense; iCSRT_RT, reaction time component of inhibitory choice stepping reaction time task, a test of combined inhibitory control and rapid step initiation.