Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 2;10(12):2670–2678. doi: 10.7150/jca.32072

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of DFS and OS in the validation sets of patients with PDAC

Variables DFS OS
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Univariate analysis
Age (>62 vs. ≤62) 1.034 (0.682-1.491) 0.922 1.008 (0.757-1.514) 0.621
Gender (male vs. female) 0.917 (0.434-1.264) 0.085 1.019 (0.716-1.884) 0.135
Tumor location (head/body vs. tail) 1.072 (0.714-1.455) 0.863 0.933 (0.487-1.534) 0.757
Neural invasion (yes vs. no) 1.152 (0.853-1.865) 0.742 1.014 (0.423-1.138) 0.608
Microvascular invasion (yes vs. no) 1.675 (1.132-2.524) 0.022 1.769 (1.058-2.974) 0.011
Differentiation (Poorly vs. well+moderately) 2.033 (1.854-4.358) 0.025 2.141 (1.573-3.864) 0.031
8th edition TNM stage ( I/ II/ III) 3.013 (2.172-4.056) <0.001 2.863 (1.368-5.477) <0.001
CA19-9 (U/mL, >37 vs. ≤37) 1.324 (0.638-2.265) 0.029 1.784 (1.008-2.339) 0.179
SRPX2 (positive vs. negative) 3.127 (1.484-5.326) <0.001 1.667 (1.067-2.746) 0.021
RAB31 (positive vs. negative) 2.434 (1.228-4.017) <0.001 1.991 (1.164-3.065) 0.002
SRPX2+RAB31 (positive vs. negative) 3.983 (2.268-6.157) <0.001 4.123 (2.667-7.403) <0.001
Multivariate analysis
8th edition TNM stage ( I/ II/ III) 2.938 (1.835-4.027) <0.001 2.551 (1.426-3.856) <0.001
SRPX2 (positive vs. negative) 2.037 (1.146-4.235) 0.004 1.739 (1.004-3.316) 0.037
SRPX2+RAB31 (positive vs. negative) 3.929 (2.908-5.456) <0.001 3.436 (2.081-6.143) <0.001

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant