Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 12;78(7):934–940. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214677

Table 3.

Differences between the SLE and HC groups for each of the CANTAB outcome measures

Variable* Measurement SLE, n=36 HC, n=30 P value
Mean (SD), Median (LQ, UQ), n (%)
PAL+
(visual memory and new learning)
Total errors (adjusted) 29.50 (19.00, 79.75) 24 (10.75, 48.75) P=0.095
VRM
(verbal memory)
Free recall – total correct
(Max.=18)
10 (8, 13) 10 (8.75, 14) P=0.327
RVP
(attention)
Total hits
(Max.=27)
13 (12, 20) 20 (15.75, 22) P= 0.002
ERT
(emotional processing)
Average percentage correct – total (%) 61.49 (8.85) 66.94 (9.36) P= 0.019
Overall mean response latency – total
(ms)+
1626.10 (1411.71, 2274.22) 1343.15 (1152.27, 1744.23) P= 0.012
OTS+
(executive function)
Mean choices to correct 1.40 (1.27, 1.73) 1.33 (1.18, 1.62) P=0.484
SWM+
(working memory)
Between errors 108.41 (57.96) 94.73 (52.36) P=0.328

Missing data: VRM: 1 SLE, ERT: 1 SLE; RVP: 1 SLE; SWM: 2 SLE; OTS: 1 SLE.

P-values in bold are significant at <0.05.

*Higher scores indicate better performance except where indicated with a “+”.

ERT, emotional recognition task; OTS, one touch stockings; Pal, paired associate learning; RVP, rapid information visual processing; SWM, spatial working memory; VRM, verbal recognition memory.