Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;8(10):e011709. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011709

Table 6.

Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative PET for Cardiac Neoplasm on CMR

Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy Positive Predictive Value Negative Predictive Value
Signal intensity variables
SUVmax 70% (32/46) 88% (66/75) 81% (98/121) 76% (35/46) 85% (64/75)
SUVmean 74% (34/46) 87% (65/75) 82% (99/121) 77% (34/44) 84% (65/77)
Hepatic normalized SUV
SUVmax 83% (38/46) 84% (63/75) 83% (101/121) 76% (38/50) 89% (63/71)
SUVmean 80% (37/46) 84% (63/75) 82% (100/121) 76% (37/49) 88% (63/72)
Blood pool normalized SUV
SUVmax 76% (35/46) 85% (64/75) 82% (99/121) 76% (35/46) 85% (64/75)
SUVmean 78% (36/46) 83% (62/75) 81% (98/121) 73% (36/49) 86% (62/72)

Data are shown as percentage (frequency). CMR indicates cardiac magnetic resonance; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; max, maximum; PET, positron emission tomography; SUV, standardized uptake value.

Cutoffs derived (for maximum sensitivity and specificity) from receiver operating characteristic curves shown in Figure 6 (parameter‐based cutoffs as follows; SUVmax 4.44, SUVmean 2.89, hepatic normalized SUVmax 1.05, hepatic normalized SUVmean 1.06, blood pool normalized SUVmax 1.78, blood pool normalized SUVmean 1.35).