Skip to main content
. 2019 May 25;8(11):e011260. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011260

Table 6.

Echocardiogram Measurements in the Established Hypertrophy Groups Before Starting 4‐Hydroxytamoxifen (Pre‐Tam) and at Experimental End (End)

Sham TAC
Pre‐Tam End Pre‐Tam End
Control (n=14) OGTKO (n=11) Control (n=14) OGTKO (n=11) Control (n=19) OGTKO (n=16) Control (n=19) OGTKO (n=16)
HR, bpm 460±9 451±15 470±10 512±9 503±7* 490±11 538±12 525±16
TAC velocity, m/s N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.4±0.1 4.4±0.1 ND ND
EDD, mm 4.3±0.0 4.4±0.1 4.3±0.1 4.7±0.1 4.3±0.1 4.1±0.1 4.4±0.1 5.0±0.1§
ESD, mm 3.3±0.1 3.4±0.1 3.2±0.1 3.9±0.1 3.3±0.1 3.1±0.1 3.4±.01 4.5±0.2§ ,
LVPWd, mm 0.81±0.02 0.82±0.03 0.83±0.03 0.87±0.04 0.94±0.03* 0.99±0.02 0.99±0.03 0.93±0.03
FS, % 22.8±1.1 21.9±1.1 23.8±0.9 17.7±0.7 22.4±1.0 24.2±1.1 21.6±1.0 10.4±1.0§ ,
EF, % 45.0±2.1 44.4±1.9 47.6±1.5 36.9±1.3 45.1±1.7 48.4±1.9 43.8±1.8 22.4±2.1§ ,

Values are expressed as mean±standard error of the mean. For Pre‐Tam heart rate (HR) in O‐linked β‐N‐acetylglucosamine transferase knockout (OGTKO) sham vs OGTKO transverse aortic constriction (TAC), P=0.073. bpm indicates beats per minute; EDD, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter; EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; ESD, left ventricular end‐systolic diameter; FS, left ventricular fractional shortening; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole; N/A, not applicable; ND, not done.

*P<0.05 Pre‐Tam control sham vs Pre‐Tam control TAC; P<0.05 End control sham vs End control TAC; P<0.05 End control sham vs End OGTKO sham; § P<0.05 End control TAC vs End OGTKO TAC; P<0.05 End OKGTO sham vs End OGTKO TAC; P<0.05 Pre‐Tam OGTKO sham vs Pre‐Tam OGTKO TAC.