Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2019 May 18;140:213–222. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.022

Table 4.

Changes in perceived stress, food reward sensitivity, and eating in response to stress over the study period in the intent-to-treat sample

Mindfulness Group Health Education Group
Outcome Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Between-Condition Δ
Effect
Cohen’s
d
p
Perceived stress
  Baseline 15.38 (1.24) 15.06 (1.33) -- --
  Six-weeks 13.08 (1.41)* 15.39 (1.52) −.36, 4.63 .45 .09
  Six-months 14.71 (1.46) 11.55 (1.57)* −5.56,.09 −.47 .06
Food reward sensitivity
  Baseline 50.35 (11.67) 53.36 (12.57) -- --
  Six-weeks 59.82 (12.52)* 82.65 (13.48)* −12.13, 22.81 .16 .55
  Six-months 37.99 (9.72) 61.67 (10.47)* 2.63, 22.53 .64 .01
Stress-eating, kcal
  Baseline 745.51 (70.59) 779.25 (76.03) -- --
  Six-weeks 846.14 (72.92) 910.98 (78.53) −151.32, 82.87 −.14 .57
  Six-months 786.00 (66.92) 989.09 (72.08)* −2.33, 276.30 .49 .05

Note: Mean (SE) are unadjusted values.

Note:

95% CI for health education group (n=25) compared to mindfulness-based group (n=29) between-condition difference on change in outcome at six-weeks and six-months. Cohen’s d refers to the standardized effect size of the between-condition difference, and the p-value refers to the significance of the between-group condition effect. All between-condition effects are adjusted for the respective baseline level of each outcome, sex, and baseline age.

Note:

*

Refers to within-condition change from baseline of p<.05.