Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 13;10:1298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01298

Table 4.

Retrospective patterns obtained in the group of participants who solved the task.

Lag −10 Lag −9 Lag −8 Lag −7 Lag −6 Lag −5 Lag −4 Lag −3 Lag −2 Lag −1 Criterion behavior
adim (2.27) tae,dos (2.07) acpla,dos (3.84) tae,tres (3.27) acpla,tres (2.67)taa,dos (3.35)taa,tres (4.76) acpla,tres (3.05) acpla,uno (3.74) taa,dos (6.24) taa,tres (5.36) rs
acpla,uno (2.13)plp,uno (2.64) plim,dos (2.74) acpla,tres (1.99)plim,tres (2.74) acpla,tres (2.0) acpla,uno (2.81) acple,uno (2.0) taa,dos (2.05) acpla,dos (2.1)taa,uno (2.1) acpla,tres (4.41) acpla,uno (2.15) rs (5.36) adin (2.55)
inc (3.12)
rs (2.06)
coj
coj (2.3) taa,tres (2.23) tae,tres (2.08) taa,tres (3.01) nrs (2.12)
taa,dos (2.13)
taa,tres (2.48)
tge (2.12)
inc (2.41)rs (4.29) adin (2.62)
rs (4.11)
tga (2.66)
cosj

Bold values indicate patterns of interest according to the aim of the study.