Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 13;10:1298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01298

Table 5.

Prospective patterns obtained in the group of participants who solved the task.

Criterion behavior Lag +1 Lag +2 Lag +3 Lag +4 Lag +5 Lag +6 Lag +7 Lag +8 Lag +9 Lag +10
rs coj (6.61)cosj (6.11)
plp,uno plp,dos (3.95) plim,dos (3.08) plim,tres (6.01)plim,dos (3.08)nace,tres (2.17) acpla,uno (3.07) acpla,uno (3.82)nace,uno (1.98) acpla,dos (1.98) naca,tres (1.98) nace,dos (1.98) nace,tres (1.98) acpla,tres (2.82)acple,dos (2.82)tae,uno (1.98) nrs (2.79) coj (2.42) taa,tres (3.28) inc (2.28) rs (2.14)
taa,tres (2.14)
plp,dos plp,tres (6.51) nace,tres (3.72) plp,uno (6.27)plim,uno (3.58) nace,uno (3.21) aday (2.17)
adin (2.17)
acpla,dos (3.66)naca,tres (3.21)nace,dos (2.06) acpla,tres (3.29) tae,uno (3.21) acpla,uno (4.56)acple,uno (3.21)taa,dos (2.17) rs (2.42) aday (2.32)
adin (2.32)
plp,tres plp,uno (10.15) plp,dos (4.82) nace,tres (2.91) acpla,dos (2.47) acpla,tres (2.28) acple,uno (4.93) nace,uno (4.33) rs (3.26) adin (2.03) cosj (2.5) aday (2.6)
plim,uno plim,dos (4.85) aday (3.16)plim,tres (2.35) plim,dos (3.21) plim,tres (3.21)acple,uno (2.06) acple,tres (2.17) acple,uno (2.06) taa,uno (3.21) acpla,dos (3.21)acple,tres (2.06)aday (2.06)nrs (2.17) acpla,uno (3.11) tae,tres (3.03)
plim,dos plim,tres (6.57) adin (3.29)acpla,uno (2.45) taa,dos (1.98) acple,tres (3.1) tae,tres (3.97) tae,dos (2.21)
plim,tres acpla,uno (4.63)
acple,dos (2.05)
plim,uno (2.05)
acpla,uno (3.82)acple,dos (2.21) acple,tres (3.37) tae,tres (2.4) taa,dos (3.5) tae,dos (2.52) taa,tres (3.2) rs (2.47)

Bold values indicate patterns of interest according to the aim of the study.