Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;7(2):65–71. doi: 10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_62_18

Table 1.

Effect of Echinacea purpurea root (100 and 200 mg/kg body weight) on the biological evaluation parameters among different groups

Parameters Experimental groups

Group I (control) Group II (CsA) Group III (CsA + EPR) (100 mg/kg BW) Group IV (CsA + EPR) (200 mg/kg BW)
Initial BW (g) 194.75±1.03 193.88±1.72 193.25±1.20 196.63±0.96
Final BW (g) 222.75±7.84 200.75±4.73a,* 182.75±5.51a,*** 189.75±7.23a,***
BWG (%) 14.39±4.55 3.16±1.48a,* −5.44±2.59a,*** −3.50±2.39a,***
FI (g/rat/day) 16.83±1.49 14.67±1.39 12.18±0.93a,* 11.25±1.08a,**
FER 0.08±0.02 0.02±0.01a,* −0.04±0.02a,***,b,* −0.03±0.01a,***,b,*

Data are mean±SE (n=8). aSignificant difference from control, bSignificant difference from CsA, cSignificant difference between CsA + EPR (100 mg/kg BW) and CsA + EPR (200 mg/kg BW), *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. BWG%: Body weight gain percent, FI: Feed intake, FER: Feed efficiency ratio, BW: Body weight, EPR: Echinacea purpurea root, CsA: Cyclosporine, SE: Standard error