Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;85(7):e00165-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00165-19

TABLE 1.

Summary of Shigella WGS development set used in this studya

Strain designation No. of strains No. (%) with concordant species designation No. of serotypes included No. of strains with serotype designation No. (%) with concordant serotype designation
S. boydii 97 79 (81.4) 21 87 68 (78.2)
S. dysenteriae 55 48 (87.3) 15 37 31 (83.8)
S. flexneri 49 47 (95.9) 13 42 33 (78.6)b
S. sonnei 19 17 (89.5) 1 19 17 (89.5)
Shigella sp. 1
EIEC 13 13 (100)
Non-Shigella/EIEC 25 25 (100)
Shigella only 221 191 (86.4) 50 185 149 (80.5)
Total 259 229 (88.4)
a

Strains were sequenced from an in-house collection (n = 58) or their WGSs were downloaded from the NCBI (n = 201).

b

Partial agreement between designation and in silico serotyping for S. flexneri was considered concordance (e.g., serotype 5 versus 5a).