. 2016 Aug 19;50(2):118–126. doi: 10.1002/eat.22592

Table 3.

Direct effects from the conditional process analysis of overvaluation, dissatisfaction, and preoccupation on distress, dietary restraint, and binge eating among male (a) and female (b) adolescents

a. Males
	Psychological Distress			Dietary Restraint			Objective Binge Eating
Predictor	Β	S.E.	90% C.I.	Β	S.E.	90% C.I.	Β	S.E.	90% C.I.
Overvaluation	1.12***	0.29	0.65, 1.60	0.15***	0.04	0.09, 0.21	0.43**	0.13	0.21, 0.65
Dissatisfaction	0.75**	0.29	0.27, 1.23	0.09*	0.04	0.03, 0.15	0.11	0.14	−0.12, 0.33
Preoccupation	0.89**	0.36	0.30, 1.48	0.40***	0.04	0.33, 0.48	0.31†	0.17	0.03, 0.58
	R ² = 0.20			R ² = 0.43			R ² = 0.09
	F (8, 522) = 16.18, p < 0.001			F (8, 522) = 48.36, p < 0.001			F (8, 522) = 6.70, p < 0.001

b. Females
	Psychological Distress			Dietary Restraint			Objective Binge Eating
Predictor	Β	S.E.	90% C.I.	Β	S.E.	90% C.I.	Β	S.E.	90% C.I.
Overvaluation	1.10***	0.2	0.77, 1.43	0.20***	0.03	0.15, 0.24	0.13	0.13	−0.08, 0.35
Dissatisfaction	0.13	0.2	−0.20, 0.45	0.14***	0.03	0.10, 0.19	0.40**	0.13	0.19, 0.61
Preoccupation	1.41***	0.16	1.15, 1.67	0.36***	0.02	0.32, 0.40	0.55***	0.10	0.38, 0.71
	R ² = 0.20			R ² = 0.59			R ² = 0.14
	F (8, 1126) = 16.18, p < 0.001			F (8, 1126) = 205.12, p < 0.001			F (8, 1126) = 23.31, p < 0.001

^*** p < 0.001, ^** p < 0.01, ^* p < 0.05, ^† p < 0.10.