Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 22;39(1):127–135. doi: 10.1111/liv.13943

Table 2.

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with decompensated cirrhosis with vs without further decompensation

Decompensated cirrhosis patients, n = 138 No further hepatic decompensation, n = 92 Further hepatic decompensation, n = 46 P‐value
Sex, male/female (% male) 86/54 (62) 57/35 (62) 27/19 (59) 0.711
Age, yr 54 ± 12 53 ± 12 54 ± 13 0.808
BMI, kg/m2 25 ± 5 25 ± 5 24 ± 5 0.771
Aetiology
Virus hepatitis, n (%) 33 (24) 20 (22) 13 (28) 0.738
(N)AFLD, n (%) 72 (52) 51 (55) 21 (46)
Other, n (%) 17 (12) 11 (12) 6 (13)
Cryptogenic, n (%) 16 (12) 10 (11) 6 (13)
Diabetes, n (%) 23 (17) 16 (17) 7 (15) 0.747
Fasting glucose, mg/dL 101 ± 21 99 ± 18 122 ± 53 0.662
Triglycerides, mg/dL 91 ± 49 90 ± 48 94 ± 52 0.667
Total cholesterol mg/dL 151 ± 54 151 ± 52 150 ± 57 0.870
Statin treatment, n (%) 8 (6) 5 (5) 3 (7) 0.350
History of variceal bleeding, n (%) 43 (31) 24 (26) 19 (41) 0.069
History of or current ascites
No ascites 29 (21) 22 (24) 7 (15) 0.422
Mild/moderate (%) 87 (63) 57 (62) 30 (65)
Severe, n (%) 22 (16) 13 (14) 9 (20)
History of or current hepatic encephalopathy, n (%) 45 (33) 24 (26) 21 (46) 0.021
INR 1.4 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.3 1.4 ± 0.2 0.298
Albumin, g/L 35 ± 6 35 ± 4 35 ± 6 0.624
MELD‐Na score, points 15 ± 5 14 ± 5 16 ± 5 0.004
Liver stiffness, kPa 46 (26‐69) 46 (26‐70) 46 (27‐69) 0.895
CAP, dB/m 235 ± 66 238 ± 66 231 ± 68 0.575
HVPG, mm Hga 19 (15‐23) 19 (15‐22) 21 (17‐25) 0.023

BMI, body mass index; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter; cACLD, compensated advanced chronic liver disease; HVPG, hepatic venous pressure gradient; INR, international normalized ratio; MELD‐Na, model for end‐stage liver disease including sodium; (N)AFLD, (non)alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Statistically significant P‐values are shown in bold.

a

Data were available in 103 patients (n = 70 without decompensation and n = 33 with decompensation).