Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 13;19(2):475–487. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14970

Table 1.

Patient characteristics compared between sequential and conventional group

Variable Tolerant patients Conventional RT
Matched SMD Pre‐matching SMD
Number of patients 22 20 707
Age at RT* (y) 33 (14) 33 (15) 4% 39 (17) 33%
Age of kidney donor* (y) 46 (13) 47 (11) 5% 49 (11) 27%
Sex match at renal transplantation* (matched) 12 (55%) 12 (60%) 10% 268 (38%) 23%
Sex (female) 10 (46%) 8 (40%) 10% 241 (34%) 35%
Overall serum creatinine after RT (μmol/l) 85 (72, 99) 118 (99, 143) 142 (115, 178)
Median total follow‐up time (y) 10 (7, 22) 11 (10, 14) 7 (4, 13)
Mean number of mismatched HLA antigens at RT* 0 (0) 0.3 (0.5) 84% 2.9 (1.6) 172%
Mean number of mismatched HLA antigens at HSCT 1 (1.3)
Age at HSCT (y) 23 (17, 30)
Time between HSCT and RT (y) 5 (3, 9)
Median IS free amount of follow‐up (%) 90 (59, 100) Patients are treated with immunosuppression throughout follow‐up

Patient characteristics compared between the tolerant and conventional groups. Standardized mean differences were computed to quantify the difference between the groups before and after matching. Variables noted by * were used in the matching procedure. Data presented by mean (standard deviation), median (first quartile, third quartile), or absolute frequency (relative frequency).