Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 20;8(6):giz066. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz066

Table 2:

Performance comparison among BiPathCNN, the base path−only CNN, and codon path−only CNN

 Group  Tool Evaluation on phage (%) Evaluation on plasmid (%)
TPR FPR AUC TPR FPR AUC
Group A 100–400 bp BiPathCNN 84.96 18.01 91.82 59.91 14.14 83.05
Base path−only 81.86 24.58 87.50 56.96 17.60 78.50
Codon path−only 86.84 20.47 91.85 62.15 16.65 82.26
Group B 400–800 bp BiPathCNN 90.75 8.37 97.21 74.56 13.37 89.64
Base path−only 88.76 17.46 93.87 72.37 18.86 85.57
Codon path−only 84.95 5.93 96.57 82.98 23.10 88.32
Group C 800–1,200 bp BiPathCNN 95.24 7.75 98.54 78.09 10.95 91.84
Base path−only 92.09 17.71 95.47 73.31 15.12 88.02
Codon path−only 94.60 12.44 97.55 73.17 12.41 89.22