Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 20;8(6):giz066. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz066

Table 3:

Identification performance of each tool with 1% base substitutions

 Group  Tool Evaluation on phage (%) Evaluation on plasmid (%)
TPR FPR AUC TPR FPR AUC
Group A 100–400 bp PPR-Meta 84.42 17.99 91.57 61.19 15.27 82.76
VirFinder 72.55 26.20 80.42 NA NA NA
VirSorter 0 0 50.00 NA NA NA
PlasFlow NA NA NA 71.72 62.82 55.86
cBar NA NA NA 52.98 46.18 53.40
Group B 400–800 bp PPR-Meta 90.05 8.48 97.02 75.07 14.03 89.39
VirFinder 78.50 18.75 87.95 NA NA NA
VirSorter 0.02 0 50.01 NA NA NA
PlasFlow NA NA NA 72.31 55.61 61.87
cBar NA NA NA 54.83 44.63 55.10
Group C 800–1,200 bp PPR-Meta 94.54 7.72 98.33 79.03 11.99 91.59
VirFinder 81.29 15.92 90.68 NA NA NA
VirSorter 0.21 0 50.11 NA NA NA
PlasFlow NA NA NA 75.24 50.91 67.15
cBar NA NA NA 56.57 42.85 56.86
Group D 5–10 kbp PPR-Meta 98.97 3.15 99.75 87.65 7.20 95.83
VirFinder 88.90 8.19 97.01 NA NA NA
VirSorter 60.30 1.13 79.80 NA NA NA
PlasFlow NA NA NA 88.57 31.42 87.86
cBar NA NA NA 64.31 34.63 64.84

NA: not applicable.