Sarin 1996.
| Methods | Single‐centre, open randomised clinical trial | |
| Participants |
Included participants: cirrhosis with high‐risk oesophageal varices (n = 68) or non‐cirrhotic portal hypertension/extrahepatic portal vein block with high risk oesophageal varices (n = 6), with no history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (Table 4) Age (mean ± standard deviation):
Proportion of men:
Aetiology of cirrhosis (banding; no intervention):
Child‐Pugh score (A/B/C):
Presence of ascites:
|
|
| Interventions |
Intervention comparison: Band ligation (n = 35) (Table 5)
No intervention (n = 33)
Cointerventions: no information provided |
|
| Outcomes |
Outcomes included in the meta‐analyses:
|
|
| Inclusion period | Not described | |
| Country | India | |
| Duration of follow‐up | Mean ± SD (months): banding 13.9 ± 4.6; no intervention 14.2 ± 5.5 | |
| Notes |
Publication status: full paper
For‐profit funding: not described |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open randomised clinical trial without blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open randomised clinical trial without blinding |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | There are no missing outcomes and all participants are included in the analyses. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Clinically relevant outcomes are defined and reported. We did not have access to the trial protocol. |
| Other bias | Low risk | No other biases identified |
| Overall bias assessment (mortality) | High risk | High risk of bias |
| Overall bias assessment (non‐mortality outcomes) | High risk | High risk of bias |