Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218569

Table 2. Frequency (%) of each SDH substitution in the 2012 Didymella tanaceti population by sampling period and field.

Subunit-substitution 12–51907 12–63242 12–70046 12–70047 All Fields Overall
Auga Nova Aug Nov Aug Nov Aug Nov Aug Nov
Wildtype 5.4 3.3 16.2b 0.0 11.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 7.1 1.1 3.6
SdhB-H277R 4.5 16.4 5.9 17.2 9.3 11.9 10.8 7.2 7.4 12.5 10.3
SdhB-H277Y 58.0 59.9 38.2 48.4 46.5 59.7 57.8 64.5 52.3 59.9 56.7
SdhB-I279V 0.0 0.7 7.4 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.7 1.0
SdhC-G79P 0.0 0.7 4.4 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.8
SdhC-H134Q/S135R 2.7 0.7 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.2 0.6
SdhC-H134R 21.4 11.8 23.5 29.7 11.6 20.9 18.6 19.3 19.7 18.5 19.0
SdhC-H134Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1
SdhC-S135R 1.8 2.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 3.9 3.0 2.8 1.8 2.2
SdhC-S73P 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 2.4 0.3 1.6 1.0
SdhD-D112E 5.4 4.6 2.9 1.6 14.0 1.5 5.9 1.8 6.2 2.7 4.1
SdhD-H122R 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.4
Samplesc 112 152 68 64 43 67 102 166 325 449 774

a Sampling period; Aug = August 2012, Nov = November 2012.

b Sampling period pairs in bold indicate significant (P < 0.05) frequency variations between periods based on multinomial logistic regression.

c Total number of individuals observed