Table 2.

Indirect effect of subjective social status on eating expectancies subscales via emotion dysregulation.

Y	Path	R2	b	SE	t	p	CI (l)	CI (u)
1	SSS ￫ DERS (a)	.385	−0.987	0.262	−3.76	<.001	−1.502	−0.473
	DERS ￫ EEI-NA (b)	.113	0.280	0.031	8.95	<.001	0.219	0.342
	SSS ￫ EEI-NA (c’)		0.380	0.328	1.16	.248	−0.264	1.024
	SSS ￫ EEI-NA (c)	.068	0.103	0.335	0.31	.758	−0.554	0.760
	SSS ￫ DERS ￫ EEI-NA (a*b)		−0.277	0.084			−0.459	−0.129
2	DERS ￫ EEI-BOR (b)	.049	0.045	0.008	5.94	<.001	0.030	0.060
	SSS￫ EEI-BOR (c’)		−0.020	0.079	−0.26	.799	−0.175	0.135
	SSS ￫ EEI-BOR (c)	.027	−0.064	0.080	−0.81	.419	−0.221	0.092
	SSS ￫ DERS ￫ EEI-BOR (a*b)		−0.044	0.015			−0.079	−0.020
3	DERS ￫ EEI-CON (b)	.121	0.078	0.008	10.36	<.001	0.064	0.093
	SSS ￫ EEI-CON (c’)		−0.029	0.079	−0.37	.712	−0.185	0.126
	SSS ￫ EEI-CON (c)	.061	−0.107	0.082	−1.31	.191	−0.267	0.053
	SSS ￫ DERS ￫ EEI-CON (a*b)		−0.077	0.023			−0.126	−0.035

Note. Path a is equal in all cases Y₁₋₃; therefore, it presented only once to avoid redundancies. N for analyses is 1,589 cases. The standard error and 95% CI for the indirect effects (a*b) are obtained through bootstrapping with 10,000 resamples. a path = Effect of X on M; b paths = Effect of M on Yi; c’ paths = Direct effect of X on Yi controlling for M; c paths = Total effect of X on Yi. SSS = Subjective Social Status-Community¹⁴; DERS = Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale²²; Eating Expectancies-Negative Affect = Eating Expectancy Inventory-Eating Helps Manage Negative Affect subscale¹⁰; Eating Expectancies-Boredom = Eating Expectancy Inventory-Eating Alleviates Boredom subscale¹⁰; Eating Expectancies-Control = Eating Expectancy Inventory-Eating Leads to Feeling out of Control subscale.¹⁰ Covariates included gender, race/ethnicity, and negative affectivity.