Skip to main content
. 2019 May 8;176(3):569–577. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05256-2

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards model for recurrence-free and overall survival

Variables Recurrence-free survival Overall survival
RR 95% CI p value RR 95% CI p value
A univariate analysis
 Age > 50 versus ≤ 50 1.16 0.58–2.59 0.69 1.45 0.64–3.88 0.40
 Tumor size > 2 cm versus ≤ 2 cm 2.65 1.41–5.14 0.0023 2.33 1.16–4.84 0.018
 Nodal status Positive versus negative 2.75 1.48–5.20 0.0015 2.26 1.12–4.56 0.023
 Nuclear grade 3 versus 1 and 2 1.03 0.52–2.17 0.94 0.69 0.34–1.45 0.32
 Ki-67 > 30% < versus ≤ 30% 1.61 0.57–6.70 0.41 0.75 0.31–2.23 0.58
 CD8 Positive versus negative 1.52 0.81–2.96 0.20 1.10 0.55–2.26 0.78
 PD-L1 on TC Positive versus negative 0.84 0.43–1.58 0.60 0.62 0.28–1.27 0.20
 Adjuvant treatment Chemo. versus no treat. 0.80 0.42–1.57 0.51 0.43 0.22–0.87 0.02
 T-bet Positive versus negative 0.54 0.22–1.14 0.11 0.36 0.11–0.92 0.032
B Multivariate analysis
 Tumor size > 2 cm versus ≤ 2 cm 2.73 1.29–6.19 0.0084 2.18 1.00–5.05 0.05
 Nodal status Positive versus negative 3.17 1.50–6.92 0.0024 2.78 1.26–6.24 0.012
 Nuclear grade 3 versus 1 and 2 0.99 0.42–2.58 0.98 0.58 0.25–1.43 0.24
 Ki-67 > 30% < versus ≤ 30%) 1.79 0.62–6.02 0.30 1.90 0.70–5.78 0.22
 CD8 Positive versus negative 2.00 0.95–4.33 0.07 1.52 0.69–3.32 0.30
 Adjuvant treatment Chemo. versus no treat. 0.67 0.32–1.43 0.29 0.39 0.18–0.85 0.018
 T-bet Positive versus negative 0.36 0.12–0.94 0.037 0.30 0.07–0.95 0.039

Bold value represents that P value was significant

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, TC tumor cells, Chemo chemotherapy, No treat no treatment