Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 20;191(Suppl 1):322. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7324-4

Table 8.

Floor and ceiling values, disturbance response, and interpolation formula for scoring final VMMI metrics. Final scores for each metric increase with disturbance

Metric Raw data response to disturbance Floor (5th percentile) Ceiling (95th percentile) Scoring formula (observed = metric value at a site)
Floristic quality assessment index Decreases 6.94 38.59 (Observed–6.94)/(38.59–6.94) × 10
Relative importance native species Decreases 44.34 100 (Observed–44.34)/(100–44.34)  × 10
Richness disturbance-tolerant Species Increasesa 0 40.0 (40–Observed)/(40–0) × 10
Relative cover native monocots Decreases 0.06 100 (Observed–0.06)/(100–0.06) × 10

Scoring based on calibration data (n = 911 sites) and applied to all data (n = 1138 sites)

aScoring reversed for metrics where raw data increases with disturbance. Scores truncated to 0 or 10 if observed values fell outside the floor to ceiling range