Skip to main content
. 2019 May 7;176(3):495–506. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05262-4

Table 3.

Overview of sensitivity analyses

Analysis Pool Number of studies Correlation STE
Main analysis All identified studies 16 0.72 0.60
Sensitivity analysis 1 HER2 status
(a) Studies reporting HER2 status of patients 13 0.68 0.45
(b) Studies not reporting HER2 status 3 n. c.a 0.86
Sensitivity analysis 2 Line of treatment
(a) Studies only including first-line patients 6 0.82 0.75
(b) Studies including pretreated patients or patients in various lines 10 0.71 n.c.b
Sensitivity analysis 3 Therapy option
(a) Studies comparing a combination therapy with a mono therapy (combi vs. mono) 12 0.65 0.47
(b) Studies comparing two monotherapies (mono vs. mono) 4 0.99 0.84

HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, n.c. not calculable

aIn order to calculate a correlation coefficient, at least 4 studies are needed

bUpper confidence limit of HROS > 1 for any value of HRPFS