Skip to main content
. 2019;19(2):196–206.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the study cohort with CKD-MBD.

Entire Study Cohort (n=58) Subgroups by Turnover Reference (peak bone mass)
High turnover (n=39) Normal turnover (n=4)§ Low turnover (n=15)
Αge (yrs) 56 (45; 67) 55 (40; 64) 63 (52; 71) 62 * (53; 75) ---
Μale/female (nb.) 27/31 17/22 0/4 10/5 ---
HD or PD (nb.) 42 31 2 9 ---
duration of dialysis (months) 56 (21; 81) 55 (27; 83) 70 (16; 123) 57 (21; 78) ---
Cinacalcet (nb.) 25 23 1 1 ---
Phosphatebinder (nb.) 29 26 1 2 ---
Patients with fx (nb.) 14 4 4 6 ---
Patients with PTX (nb.) 9 5 0 4 ---
Biochemical1
 PTH (pg/ml) 264 (75; 826) 475 (156; 1047) 64 (62; 345) 90 ** (40; 189) 10-65
 APH (µmol/l×s) 1.9 (1.6; 2.8) 2.1 (1.6; 2.9) 1.2 (1.2; 2.6) 1.9 (1.1; 2.9) 0.6-2.20
 Ca (mmol/l) 2.34 (2.24; 2.52) 2.35 (2.26; 2.52) 2.24 (1.84; 2.32) 2.38 (2.23; 2.63) 2.2-2.65
 25OHD3 (nmol/l) 64 (36; 90) 63 (37; 90) 119 (63; 175) 65 (22; 83) 75-375
 Phosphate (mmol/l) 1.58 (1.12; 1.92) 1.63 (1.21; 2.00) 1.14 (1.06; 1.43) 1.44 (0.97; 2.00) 0.76-1.37
Histomorphometric[2
 BV/TV (%) 16.6 (10.3; 21.8) 17.4 (11.0; 21.7) 14.5 (5.7; 21.1) 16.10 (9.60; 22.70) 20.43 (4.0)
 OS/BS (%) 3.7 (0.6; 11.9) 6.1 (3.4; 17.5) 1.0 (0.2; 6.4) 0.00 (0.00; 0.40) 14.3 (3.0)
 Ob.S/BS (%) 3.4 (0.3; 8.3) 5.1 (3.3; 14.2) 1.4 (0.8; 1.9) 0.00 (0.00; 0.00) 4.5 (3.2)
 ES/BS (%) 15.1 (10.0; 26.3) 21.8 (13.3; 30.3) 12.4 (10.6; 32.8) 7.20 (4.20; 10.40) 6.1 (1.9)
 Oc.S/BS (%) 3.3 (0.2; 9.2) 6.8 (3.2; 13.3) 1.4 (0.3; 2.0) 0.0 (0.0; 0.0) 2.5 (1.5)

Data shown are median (25th; 75th percentiles) or mean (SD).

Abbreviations: nb.= number of patients; HD = hemodialysis; PD = peritoneal dialysis; PTX = parathyroidectomy; PTH = parathyroid hormone, APH = alkaline phosphatase, Ca = calcium, 25OHD3 = 25-hydroxyvitamin D3; BV/TV = bone volume per tissue volume, OS/BS = osteoid surface per bone surface, Ob.S/BS = osteoblast surface per bone surface; ES/BS = eroded surface per bone surface; Oc.S/BS osteoclast surface per bone surface; nomenclature according to Parfitt et al[49.

§

no statistical comparison due to small sample size

**

p<0.01,

*

p<0.05 low versus high turnover (adjusted for age if appropriate)

1 Biochemical information was not available from all patients;

2 No statistical comparison between bone turnover groups as histomorphometry was used to define bone turnover status.

3 Reference data are from a previous work by Delling[18.