Table 1.

Studies included in Review.

References	Study design	Setting and population	Sample size	n(%) AA∗
Bates and Harris, 2004	Qualitative focus group study	Southeastern United States General population	N = 215	118(55)
Brewer et al., 2014	Quantitative cross-sectional survey study	Orlando, Florida at The Links, Incorporated 38th National Assembly Female Links Members	N = 381	381(100)
Buseh et al., 2013	Mixed methods; CBPR and focus group study	Wisconsin Genomic Initiative Community members	N = 21	21(100)
Bussey-Jones et al., 2010	Mixed methods telephone survey	North Carolina North Carolina Colorectal Cancer Study Database	N = 801	153(19%)
Cain et al., 2016	Quantitative cross-sectional survey study	Washington DC Metro Area Community members	N = 304	304(100)
Cohn et al., 2015	Qualitative exploratory study	Central Harlem, New York Community members	N = 46	39(89) 4(9) AA/ Hispanic 1(2) AA/ Native American
Dash et al., 2014	Mixed methods; focus group and cross-sectional survey study	Southeast/Southwest Washington, DC Community members	Focus groups (n = 41) Surveys (n = 321)	Focus groups 41(100) Surveys 234(73)
Diaz et al., 2008	Quantitative cross-sectional survey study	South Carolina State University Students	N = 200	200(100)
Drake et al., 2017	Qualitative focus group study	St. Louis, Missouri; Prostate Cancer Community Partnership Men with prostate cancer	N = 70	70(100)
Erwin et al., 2013	Mixed methods; focus group and cross-sectional survey study	Niagara Falls, New York Community members and Key informants	Key informant interviews (n = 9) Community focus groups (n = 21) Staff focus group (n = 5) Surveys (n = 64)	Community focus groups 13(62) Surveys 34(53)
Goldenberg et al., 2011	Mixed methods; computer assisted telephone interviewing system	Patients from Duke University, Johns Hopkins, University of Arizona, University of North Carolina, University of Utah	N = 1,193	192(16)
Hagiwara et al., 2014	Quantitative survey study	Detroit, Michigan Community members	N = 78	78(100)
Halbert et al., 2016	Quantitative survey study using vignettes	National sample of AA	N = 510	510(100)
Hoyo et al., 2003	Qualitative semi-structured interview and focus group study	North Carolina Community members	Focus groups (n = 46) Interviews (n = 9)	55(100)
Isler et al., 2013	Qualitative semi-structured interview study	North Carolina Community members	N = 91	72(79)
Jones et al., 2017	Quantitative cross-sectional survey study	Kansas City, Kansas Community members	N = 169	169(100)
Kraft et al., 2018	Qualitative focus group study using trigger videos	Northern California Patients at a large multispecialty practice	N = 122	23(18.9)
Lee et al., 2019	Qualitative focus group study using trigger videos	Northern California Patients at a large multispecialty practice	N = 122	23(18.9)
Luque et al., 2012	Qualitative focus group study	Tampa, Florida Community members	N = 95	33(34.7)
McDonald et al., 2014	Quantitative survey study	National sample of AA	N = 1,033	1,033(100)
McDonald et al., 2012	Qualitative focus group study	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania	N = 91	91(100)
Ochs-Balcom et al., 2011	Qualitative focus group study	Buffalo, New York Female breast cancer survivors	N = 14	14(100)
Skinner et al., 2015	Qualitative focus group study	Lenoir County, North Carolina Community members	N = 25	19(76)
Walker et al., 2014	Qualitative focus group study	Jackson, Mississippi Community members	N = 140	140(100)

^∗AA, African American.