Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 27;48(1):70–78. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13110

Table 3.

Breathing scoresa

Breathing score response Observer Method of induction, No. of dogs (%)
Initial P Initial M Second P + S Second P + D Second M + S Second M + D
0 DRD 1 (5.2) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
MBB 0 (0) 3 (16.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
1 DRD 8 (42.1) 11 (55) 3 (33.3) 0 (0) 5 (50) 0 (0)
MBB 12 (60) 12 (66.7) 4 (40) 0 (0) 4 (44.4) 0 (0)
2 DRD 8 (42.1) 5 (25) 3 (33.3) 2 (20) 3 (30) 4 (40)
MBB 8 (40) 2 (11.1) 3 (30) 2 (20) 5 (55.5) 3 (33.3)
3 DRD 2 (10.5) 2 (10) 3 (33.3) 8 (80) 2 (20) 6 (60)
MBB 0 (0) 1 (5.6) 3 (30) 8 (80) 0 (0) 6 (66.6)
Total responses DRD 19 20 9 10 10 10
MBB 20 18 10 10 9 9
P value .159 .966

D, doxapram; M, methohexital; P, propofol; S, saline.

a

Assigned by direct observers (DRD and MBB) during initial and second evaluations of group P and group M. Each number represents the frequency of dogs (%)in which the depth of breathing was scored. Breathing was scored as 0 = no spontaneous respirations, 1 = shallow respiration, slow respiratory rate, weak attempt, 2 = moderate respiration rate and attempt, and 3 = deep respiration, normal respiratory rate, and strong attempt. The first observer (DRD) was not available for evaluation of 1 dog in the P group, yielding 39 dogs in total that were evaluated. The second observer (MBB) was absent for evaluation of 2 dogs in the M group, yielding 38 dogs in total that were evaluated.