Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 23;221(4):2308–2319. doi: 10.1111/nph.15561

Table 1.

Estimated divergence times from Beast for key nodes for testing biogeographic hypotheses

Nodes Not calibrated withCallitris octothamna C. octothamna’ (calibration 10) at parent of Callitris stem node C. octothamna’ at Callitris stem node
Unconstrained Constrained Unconstrained Constrained Unconstrained
A. Callitroideae–Cupressoideae 127.0 (105–148) 127.0 (106–150) 139.7 (125–154) 139.6 (126–156) 148.4 (134–163)
B. Widdringtonia–(Diselma, Fitzroya) 52.5 (41–66) 52.3 (41–66) 58.3 (45–73) 58.7 (45–73) 64.6 (47–82)
C. DiselmaFitzroya 32.8 (30–38) 32.8 (30–38) 33.2 (30–39) 33.2 (31–39) 33.5 (30–41)
D. Callitris NC–Cmacleayana 34.8 (25–46) 35.3 (25–46) 39.3 (28–50) 39.4 (28–51) 43.0 (31–56)
E. PilgerodendronLibocedrus 15.6 (9–24) 15.7 (9–24) 17.3 (10–26) 17.3 (10–27) 18.5 (11–28)
F. CFDW stem 87.2 (71–105) 87.6 (71–105) 103.0 (100–110) 103.1 (100–110) 113.0 (106–112)
G. Callitris crown 41.6 (33–51) 42.0 (33–52) 46.9 (38–57) 47.3 (38–57) 51.5 (41–62)

Node labels (A–G) refer to Fig. 1. Primary columns represent different calibration settings for ‘Callitris octothamna’, including its exclusion. Sub‐columns differ in whether monophyly of the CFDW–LibodedrusPilgerodendron clade was constrained, to the exclusion of Austrocedrus. All these results are from the combined cpDNA + nDNA dataset. The unconstrained topology reflects that from cpDNA alone and places Libocedrus + Pilgerodendron as sister to CFDW (Supporting Information Fig. S1). The constrained topology reflects that from nDNA alone (Fig. S2). Values are median age estimates in million yr ago (Ma) (95% HPD). NC, New Caledonia; CFDW, Callitris, Fitzroya, Diselma and Widdringtonia.