Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 28;58(7):1221–1226. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key430

Table 2.

Cardiac serum biomarker and CMR measures in study participants with significant arrhythmias compared with those without significant arrhythmias

Significant arrhythmia on ILR (n = 8) No significant arrhythmia on ILR (n = 11) Mean difference (95% CI)
Cardiac serum biomarkers
    hs-TnI, ng/l 141 (184) 23 (51) 117 (−11, 245)
    NT-proBNP, ng/l 198 (128) 106 (122) 92 (−30, 215)
    CK, IU/l 152 (162) 133 (145) 19 (−138, 176)
CMR (n = 15)
    LGE present (n = 5) 1 (7) 4 (29)
    LGE not present (n = 9) 4 (29) 5 (36)
    ECV (n = 14) 32 (2) 29 (4) 2 (−2, 6)
    MPR (n = 12) 1.9 (0.4) 2.1 (1.2) −0.2 (−1.3, 0.8)
    LVEF 62 (4) 59 (5) 2 (−3, 8)
    LV mass/BSA, g/m2 46 (7) 44 (14) 2 (−10, 15)

Mean (s.d.) values are shown unless stated otherwise. 15/19 patients had CMR performed. Of these 15 with a CMR, LGE and ECV data could be obtained from 14, and perfusion data from 12. BSA: body surface area; CK: creatine kinase; CMR: cardiovascular magnetic resonance; ECV: extracellular-volume fraction; hs-TnI: high-sensitivity troponin I; ILR: implantable loop recorder; LGE: late gadolinium enhancement; LV: left ventricular; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MPR: myocardial perfusion reserve; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.