. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Sch Psychol. 2019 Mar 15;73:56–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.03.003

Table 5.

Information Used to Evaluate Tested LPA Dual-Factor Mental Health Models

Model	Number of classes	Log likelihood	BIC	p-value of BLRT	p-value of LMRT	Entropy	BF	cmP	Class Prevalence
Grade 9 - Model 1 (n = 467)	1	−2154.43	4382.61	—	—	1.00	<.001	<.001	1.00
	2	−1919.37	3955.53	<.001	<.001	0.72	<.001	<.001	.50, .50
	3	−1831.09	3821.98	<.001	0.582	0.79	<.001	<.001	.10, .32, .58
	4	−1775.86	3754.55	<.001	0.018	0.77	<.001	<.001	.10, .20, .24, .47
	5	−1743.02	3731.90	<.001	0.401	0.80	0.002	0.002	.01, .12, .18, .22, .47
	6	−1715.46	3719.80	<.001	0.242	0.77	<.001	0.998	.01, .07, .14, .19, .20, .40

Grade 9 - Model 2 (n = 467)	1	−2154.43	4382.61	—	—	1.00	<.001	<.001	1.00
	2	−1879.02	3911.70	<.001	<.001	0.77	<.001	<.001	.41, .59
	3^*	−1769.82	3773.21	<.001	0.021	0.77	<.001	<.001	.19, .30, .51
	4^*	−1718.55	3750.57	NC	0.039	0.80	2.180	0.69	.14, .19, .21, .46
	5^*	−1679.38	3752.13	NC	0.235	0.81	>10	0.31	.05, .12, .19, .22, .42
	6^*	−1649.52	3772.31	NC	0.124	0.82	<.001	<.001	.03, .05, .13, .16, .23, .39

Grade 10 - Model 1 (n = 861)	1	−4099.00	8279.09	—	—	1.00	<.001	<.001	1.00
	2	−3555.22	7238.85	<.001	<.001	0.81	<.001	<.001	.31, .69
	3	−3356.31	6888.33	<.001	<.001	0.79	<.001	<.001	.14, .32, .53
	4	−3296.22	6815.45	<.001	0.438	0.78	<.001	<.001	.07, .19, .25, .49
	5	−3248.91	6768.15	<.001	0.163	0.79	<.001	<.001	.06, .07, .12, .28, .46
	6	−3210.04	6737.71	<.001	0.221	0.78	<.001	1.00	.04, .05, .12, .16, .24, .38

Grade 10 - Model 2 (N = 861)	1	−4099.00	8279.09	—	—	1.00	<.001	<.001	1.00
	2^*	−3498.59	7166.14	<.001	0.002	0.75	<.001	<.001	.45, .55
	3^*	−3238.72	6734.25	NC	0.006	0.81	<.001	<.001	.22, .23, .55
	4^*	−3142.76	6630.17	NC	0.169	0.78	<.001	<.001	.13, .17, .25, .44
	5^*	−3076.64	6585.80	NC	0.102	0.75	<.001	<.001	.10, .11, .21, .27, .31
	6^*	−3024.31	6568.99	NC	0.142	0.77	<.001	1.00	.03, .09, .13, .19, .27, .29

Grade 11 - Model 1 (n = 758)	1	−3510.00	7099.56	—	—	1.00	<.001	<.001	1.00
	2	−3023.55	6173.09	<.001	<.001	0.79	<.001	<.001	.37, .63
	3	−2860.97	5894.33	<.001	0.040	0.80	<.001	<.001	.13, .33, .54
	4	−2791.14	5801.09	<.001	0.010	0.77	<.001	<.001	.06, .21, .29, .44
	5	−2720.24	5705.70	<.001	0.003	0.80	0.005	0.01	.05, .12, .17, 24, .42
	6	−2691.74	5695.13	<.001	0.192	0.82	<.001	0.99	.01, .06, .12, .17, .24, .41

Grade 11 - Model 2 (n = 758)	1	−3510.00	7099.56	—	—	1	<.001	<.001	1.00
	2^*	−2950.43	6066.62	NC	<.001	0.77	<.001	<.001	.48, .52
	3^*	−2712.38	5676.72	<.001	0.137	0.84	<.001	<.001	.11, .32, .57
	4^*	−2611.28	5560.73	NC	0.310	0.79	<.001	1.00	.14, .20, .21, .45
	5	No Convergence
	6	No Convergence

Grade 12 - Model 1 (n = 306)	1	−1482.459	3033.601	—	—	1.00	<.001	<.001	1.00
	2	−1299.777	2708.302	<.001	0.017	0.76	<.001	<.001	.44, .56
	3	−1210.031	2568.875	<.001	0.001	0.84	<.001	<.001	.08, .38, .53
	4	−1165.242	2519.363	<.001	0.001	0.84	0.218	0.17	.08, .21, .34, .37
	5	−1143.689	2516.321	<.001	0.421	0.82	9.840	0.76	.08, .13, .19, .26, .34
	6	−1125.943	2520.894	<.001	0.115	0.84	<.001	0.08	.06, .07, .13, .14, .27, .33

Grade 12 - Model 2 (n = 306)	1	−1482.459	3033.601	—	—	1.00	<.001	<.001	1.00
	2^*	−1262.427	2667.944	NC	<.001	0.95	<.001	<.001	.19, .81
	3^*	−1171.73	2560.956	NC	0.063	0.84	<.001	1.00	.18, .24, .59
	4	No Convergence
	5	No Convergence
	6	No Convergence

Note. Bolded values indicate preferred model for a given fit index. Shaded rows indicate model selected for each year. NC = no convergence.

log likelihood starting and best-solution values did not converge, indicating model instability