Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;33(6):282–293. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0311

Appendix Table A1.

Adjusted Logistic Regressions of Internalized Substance Use Stigma and Optimal Adherence After Adjusting for Potential Confounders

  AOR 95% CI p
SU-related self-devaluationa
 Moderate 0.96 (0.37–2.53) 0.939
 High 0.92 (0.37–2.28) 0.861
 Very high 0.43 (0.16–1.17) 0.098
Control variables
 Age 0.99 (0.96–1.03) 0.825
 Race (1 = black) 0.79 (0.34–1.82) 0.581
 Sex (1 = male) 1.08 (0.49–2.39) 0.855
 Education (1 = < high school) 1.75 (0.80–3.83) 0.160
 HIV-related stigma 1.01 (0.99–1.02) 0.373
 SU severity (ASSIST-GCIDR) 1.00 (0.99–1.02) 0.642
 Alcohol use severity (AUDIT-C) 0.91 (0.81–1.01) 0.099
Social support
 Tangible 1.70* (1.01–2.82) 0.043
 PSI 0.41* (0.19–0.89) 0.024
 E/I 1.26 (0.64–2.50) 0.500
 Affectionate 1.30 (0.72–2.33) 0.384
a

Low = reference.

*

p ≤ 05.

AOR, Adjusted Odds Ratio; ASSIST, alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test; AUDIT-C, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; E/I, emotional/informational; GCIDR, global continuum of illicit drug risk; PSI, positive social interaction; SU, substance use.

Statistically significant findings are in bold.