Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Neurol. 2019 Apr 27;318:124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.04.017

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Strength of Suppression and Facilitation Depend on Background G Force in Antagonist Reinnervation Group. All data from conditioned trials were pooled per control (A) and antagonist reinnervation (B) groups and plotted vs. background force in Fig 8. C: Effects of background G force on the strength of facilitation (top) and suppression (bottom). Lines represent change from observed pooled means of control to reinnervated antagonist groups for three background forces. Results of Hierarchical Factorial Bayesian ANOVA reveals empirically derived posterior distributions of means are only credibly different between 0.2 to 1N background G forces for control as compared to all contrasts in antagonist reinnervation groups.