Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med. 2019 Jan 16;132(6):722–732.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.01.004

Table 4.

Pooled Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding Outcomes

Any Outcome Venous Thromboembolism Major Bleeding All Bleeding*
Group Studies, n Procedures,
n
Studies, n Events/ Procedures, n Pooled incidence, % (95% CI) Studies, n Events/ Procedures, n Pooled incidence, % (95% CI) Studies, n Events/ Procedures, n Pooled incidence, % (95% CI)
Main Analysis

All studies 28 6915 27 40.5 / 6886 15 41 / 3786 18 137.1/ 6494
 With bridging 27 3448 26 25 / 3427 0.7 (0.4–1.2) 13 30 / 1702 1.8 (1.2–2.5) 16 114 / 3074 3.9 (2.0–7.4)
 Without bridging 8 3459 8 15.5 / 3459 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 5 11 / 2084 0.4 (0.1–1.5) 7 23.1 / 3420 0.4 (0.1–1.7)§

Sensitivity analyses

Excluding studies without specific outcome reporting for population of interest || 18 6648 17 40.5 / 6619 11 41 / 3557 14 137.1/ 6265
 With bridging 18 3234 17 25 / 3213 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 11 30 / 1666 1.8 (1.3–2.6) 14 114 / 3038 4.4 (2.3–8.2)
 Without bridging 6 3406 6 15.5 / 3406 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 3 11 / 1891 0.5 (0.1–2.0) 5 23.1 / 3227 0.6 (0.1–2.4)

Excluding conference abstracts 26 6725 25 38.5 / 6696 13 37 / 3620 16 111.1/ 6328
 With bridging 25 3272 24 23 / 3251 0.7 (0.4–1.2) 12 26 / 1550 1.6 (0.8–3.2) 15 88 / 2922 3.4 (1.8–6.6)
 Without bridging 7 3445 7 15.5 / 3445 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 4 11 / 2070 0.4 (0.1–1.6) 6 23.1 / 3406 0.4 (0.1–1.8)**

Excluding Sjögren, et al. 27 4245 26 25 / 4224 15 41 / 3832 17 125 / 3878
 With bridging 26 2117 25 15 / 2096 0.6 (0.3–1.3) 13 30 / 1702 1.8 (1.2–2.5) 15 104 / 1743 4.9 (2.7–8.7)
 Without bridging 7 2128 7 10 / 2128 0.5 (0.2–1.2) 5 11 / 2084 0.4 (0.1–1.5) 6 21 / 2089 0.6 (0.1–2.8)

Excluding studies with <100 procedures 7 6173 7 35.5 / 6165 6 39 / 3481 7 113.1/ 6143
 With bridging 7 2764 7 20 / 2764 0.7 (0.4–1.2) 5 28 / 1411 2.0 (1.4–2.9) 6 90 / 2742 4.0 (1.8–8.7)
 Without bridging 5 3401 5 15.5 / 3401 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 4 11 / 2070 0.4 (0.1–1.6) 5 23.1 / 3401 0.5 (0.1–1.9)

Subgroup analyses

High thromboembolic risk †† 9 394 9 3 / 394 7 45 / 361
 With bridging 9 373 9 3 / 373 0.8 (0.3–2.5) NA NA NA 7 44 / 340 7.5 (3.1–17.4)
 Without bridging 1 21 1 0 / 21 NA NA NA NA 1 1 / 21 NA

LMWH dose ††
 Therapeutic dose 11 981 10 5 / 580 0.9 (0.4–2.1) 4 10 / 387 2.6 (1.4–4.7) 6 35 / 800 3.9 (2.0–7.5)
 Prophylactic dose 6 362 5 3 / 208 1.4 (0.5–4.4) 3 4 / 188 2.1 (0.8–5.5) 4 32 / 342 4.4 (0.9–18.3)
*

includes major bleeding and any other bleeding outcomes that were specifically reported for patients with previous venous thromboembolism

in the study by Sjögren et al,18 procedures in the non-bridging group were propensity score matched and weighted to equal the number of procedures in the bridging group; therefore, the number of procedures with bridging and without bridging does not add up to the exact number of overall procedures

the non-integer number of outcome events (5.5 venous thromboembolic events) in the study by Sjögren et al was rounded to the next integer for this analysis. When rounding down to the next lower integer, the results were similar (pooled incidence 0.4%, 95%CI 0.3–0.7%)

§

the non-integer number of outcome events (2.1 events of any bleeding) in the study by Sjögren et al was rounded to the next integer for this analysis. When rounding up to the next higher integer, the results were similar (pooled incidence 0.5%, 95%CI 0.1–1.8%)

||

some studies did not report results separately for patients with prior venous thromboembolism and could only be included because there were no venous thromboembolism 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 31, 36, 39, 42 or bleeding2830, 40 outcomes in the overall population. As this might bias our study sample to studies with a low number of outcome events, we excluded these studies for this subgroup analysis.

the non-integer number of outcome events (2.1 events of any bleeding) in the study by Sjögren et al was rounded to the next integer for this analysis. When rounding up to the next higher integer, the results were similar (pooled incidence 0.7%, 95%CI 0.2–2.4%)

**

the non-integer number of outcome events (2.1 events of any bleeding) in the study by Sjögren et al was rounded to the next integer for this analysis. When rounding up to the next higher integer, the results were similar (pooled incidence 0.5%, 95%CI 0.1–1.9%)

††

for these analyses, we included only studies that reported outcomes separately for the specific subgroup of interest