Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Res. 2018 Dec 21;98(1):212–218. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24372

Table 1:

Summary of the challenges in PHE assessment and recommendations for future investigations of PHE

Challenges in PHE Assessments Recommendations for Using PHE in Clinical Research
CT vs. MRI
- PHE is easier to delineate on MRI compared to CT. However, MRI is not routinely performed during the hyperacute phase and is more expensive
ICH Size and Location
- Further investigations are needed to elucidate the impact of ICH volume and location on PHE progression and its relationship to outcomes
- Consider limiting enrollment into studies using PHE as a primary endpoint to moderate-sized ICHs since these patients are more likely to exhibit critical growth of PHE


PHE Parameters
- Absolute PHE may be a better predictor of outcome than rPHE, particularly in patients with small ICHs
- The rate of PHE growth and EED are promising parameters and require further investigations


Timing
- Interventions aimed at targeting PHE should be initiated within hours of ICH onset and maintained for 3-7 days
- Follow-up of PHE progression/resolution a few weeks after treatment is advised to capture the full effect on the intervention on the known natural history of PHE progression
Measurement of PHE
Delineation:
- Manual delineation is labor intensive and has variable reproducibility
- Fully-automated delineation is limited by potential inaccuracies related to spatial normalization of the brain
- A semi-automated threshold-based methods may address the limitations above

Parameters:
- There are no consistent or uniform parameters in use. Various parameters and definitions for PHE have been used in various studies. These include: absolute PHE, relative PHE, rate of PHE growth (volume/time or % change/time), EED, rate of change in EED (volume/time or % change/time)

Timing:
- The timing of PHE assessments has been inconsistent. PHE progresses fast during the first few days and reaches its peak by 2-3 weeks
- Variable times have been reported in the literature varying from 24h to 72h or longer after ICH
Relationship between PHE and Outcome
- Variability in timing of PHE and/or outcome assessments and parameters used makes it difficult to fully ascertain the relationship between PHE and long-term functional outcomes after ICH
Study Design
- To accurately determine the impact of PHE on outcomes, future studies should:
  - Be prospective
  - Have pre-specified methods, parameters, and endpoints
  - Have adequate sample size calculations and statistical power