Table 3.
Multilevel latent growth curve analyses123
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial level of happiness | Change of happiness | Initial level of happiness | Change of happiness | Initial level of happiness | Change of happiness | |
PM2.5 | −.01(.006)* | −.003(.004) | ||||
PM10 | −.01(.003)** | −.001(.002) | ||||
NO2 | −.01(.01)* | −.003(.004) | ||||
% of college graduates | .001(.002) | −.001(.001) | −.001(.002) | −.001(.001) | .002(.002) | −.001(.001) |
Population densitya | – | – | -† | – | – | – |
Mutualityb | −.09(.10) | – | −.19(.11)† | – | −.03(.10) | – |
Male | .02(.03) | .04(.02)* | .02(.03) | −.04(.02)* | .02(.03) | −.04(.02)* |
Family incomea | – | – | – | – | ||
Non-intact familyb | −.06(.04) | – | −.06(.04) | – | −.06(.04) | – |
Wave 1 Class rank | .02(.01) | .02(.01) | .02(.01) | .02(.01) | .02(.01) | .02(.01) |
Wave 1 Negative life event | −.02(.008)* | .002(.004) | −.02(.008)* | .002(.004) | −.02(.008)* | .002(.004) |
Wave 1 Low family cohesion | −.25(.03)** | .09(.02)** | −.25(.03)** | .09(.02)** | −.25(.03)** | .09(.02)** |
Wave 1 Self-esteem | .04(.004)** | −.01(.003)** | .04(.004)** | −.01(.003)** | .04(.004)** | −.01(.003)** |
Wave 1 Negative emotion | −.25(.02)** | .07(.01)** | −.25(.02)** | .07(.01)** | −.25(.02)** | .07(.01)** |
Wave 1 Low peer support | −.17(.03)** | .03(.02)† | −.17(.03)** | .03(.02)† | −.17(.03)** | .03(.02)† |
Wave 1 deviance | .01(.01) | −.001(.009) | .01(.01) | −.001(.009) | .01(.01) | −.001(.009) |
n1 = 2538; n2 = 40
†p < .1;*p < .05; **p < .01
1The presented number is the estimated coefficient and standard error is in the parentheses
2Model fit for each of the four models is acceptable, which may be obtained from the first author upon the request
3The basic growth curve model had marginal fit (χ2 (1) = 13; CFI = .98; RMSEA = .068) with both initial level and change of happiness are all significant (initial level = 2.98**; change = −.10**).When estimated in three, both initial level and change of happiness remained significant with identical signs (initial level = 2.97**; change = −.067**)
aThe effects of these two variables were estimated but very small because of original measurement scale. Hence, they were not presented here
bThe effects of these two variables on the change of happiness are not estimated because these effects caused model estimation problems due to very small effect