Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 21;19:129. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0754-4

Table 1.

Marginal (individual) power obtained for each outcome, when analysing two (top), three (middle) or four (bottom) continuous outcomes using a variety of methods to control the FWER

Pairwise correlation between outcomes None Bonferroni Holm Hochberg Hommel Stepdown minP
Two outcomes
 0 80.9 72.4 78.5 79.2 79.2 78.2
 0.2 80.6 71.8 77.8 78.6 78.6 77.7
 0.4 80.0 71.3 76.6 77.7 77.7 76.7
 0.6 80.0 71.0 76.0 77.4 77.4 76.7
 0.8 80.3 71.3 75.6 77.4 77.4 77.2
Three outcomes
 0 80.2 65.9 75.2 76.7 76.8 75.5
 0.2 80.5 66.4 75.0 76.6 76.7 75.3
 0.4 80.2 65.7 73.8 75.4 75.6 73.2
 0.6 80.0 65.7 73.3 75.0 75.2 73.8
 0.8 80.0 65.9 72.2 74.6 74.8 76.1
Four outcomes
 0 80.5 62.3 73.2 75.0 75.2 72.7
 0.2 80.4 62.3 72.6 74.4 74.8 72.2
 0.4 80.6 62.4 72.1 74.1 74.4 72.2
 0.6 80.3 62.0 70.7 73.1 73.5 72.3
 0.8 80.3 61.9 69.7 73.2 73.6 73.5

D/AP method was not examined due to the poor performance observed when exploring FWER

There was no missing data in any of the outcomes. The tables display various degrees of correlation between the outcomes, ranging from no correlation (ρ =0.0) to strong correlation (ρ =0.8)