Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2019 May 21;57(1):68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.016

Table 2.

Associations of Baseline Fitness With Incident CKDa in Full Sample and Fitness Groups

Association of fitness Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
HR
(95% CI)
HR
(95% CI)
HR
(95% CI)
HR
(95% CI)
HR
(95% CI)
Duration with CKD
 Fitness per 1 minute lower duration 1.13 (1.06,1.21) 1.17 (1.07, 1.27) 1.16 (1.06,1.26) 1.14 (1.04,1.25) 1.14 (1.04,1.25)
Groups with CKD
 Low vs high fitness (ref) 3.76 (2.38, 5.94) 2.70 (1.65, 4.40) 2.57 (1.56, 4.24) 2.42 (1.40, 4.10) 2.44 (1.42, 4.20)
 Low vs moderate fitness (ref) 2.35 (1.56, 3.53) 1.98 (1.31, 3.00) 1.93 (1.27, 2.93) 1.83 (1.18, 2.83) 1.83 (1.19, 2.85)
 Moderate vs high fitness (ref) 1.60 (1.02, 2.52) 1.37 (0.86, 2.18) 1.33 (0.83, 2.13) 1.32 (0.82,2.10) 1.34 (0.83,2.13)

Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). Model 1: Unadjusted. Model 2: Model 1 + gender, race, age, maximal education throughout study, and field center. Model 3: Model 2 + time varying healthy eating index score, smoking status, alcohol intake. Model 4: Model 3 + time varying BMI, systolic BP, and fasting glucose. Model 5: Model 4+ baseline eGFR. Low fitness: bottom lowest gender-specific quintile (bottom 20%); Moderate fitness: quintiles 2–3 (middle 20%–60%); High fitness: quintiles 4–5 (top >60%).

a

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2.

HR, hazard ratio.