Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1918–1928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803731

Table 1.

Cox Proportional-Hazards Association Analysis of LIMS1 Collision Genotype with Allograft Rejection in a Time-to-Event Analysis, According to Cohort.

Cohort Population Minimally Adjusted Model* Fully Adjusted Model
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Value Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Columbia discovery cohort 705 Recipients 1.84 (1.35–2.50) 9.8×10−5 1.76 (1.29–2.40) 3.8×10−4
Belfast replication cohort 387 Donor–recipient pairs 1.70 (1.03–2.82) 4.0×10−2 1.77 (1.06–2.93) 2.8×10−2
TransplantLines replication cohort 833 Donor–recipient pairs 1.53 (1.13–2.09) 6.6×10−3 1.58 (1.14–2.19) 5.7×10−3
Torino replication cohort 784 Donor–recipient pairs 1.49 (1.02–2.16) 3.9×10−2 1.53 (1.05–2.23) 2.6×10−2
All replication cohorts 2004 Donor–recipient pairs 1.55 (1.25–1.93) 6.5×10−5 1.58 (1.27–1.97) 5.1×10−5
All cohorts 2709 Transplants 1.63 (1.37–1.95) 4.7×10−8 1.63 (1.36–1.95) 9.4×10−8
*

The analysis was adjusted for cohort only (if applicable).

The analysis was adjusted for recipient’s age, sex, race, ethnic group, HLA-mismatch status, and cohort (if applicable).