Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug 24;89(4):842–851.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.029

TABLE 3.

EUS findings in HRIs and control subjects

Outcome variable Control subjects* (n = 118) HRIs* (n = 65) Unadjusted P value Adjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted P value
3+ CP changes 2 (2) 12 (18) <.001 15.8 (2.6–97.0) .003,§,
Hyperechoic strands 5 (4) 22 (34) <.001 15.4 (4.3–55.1) <.001§
Lobularity 5 (4) 14 (22) <.001 7.6 (2.0–28.8) .003,§
Cysts 1 (1) 16 (25) <.001 36.2 (4.1–318) .001§,ǁ
Hyperechoic duct walls 3 (3) 15 (23) <.001 37.2 (6.6–209) <.001**
Hypoechoic foci 3 (3) 13 (20) <.001 8.0 (1.9–32.9) .004§

Univariate analyses with unadjusted P values and multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjusted OR and P values are shown.

HRIs, High-risk individuals; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CP, chronic pancreatitis.

*

Values are n (%).

Pearson χ2 test.

Potential confounders are ‡male gender

§

number of EUS

any ethanol use

ǁ

age and

**

body mass index.