Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;316(5):R472–R485. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00391.2018

Table 2.

Relaxation responses to acetylcholine in mesenteric and uterine arteries from cycling and late pregnant rats fed with pelleted chow (chow group) or a free-choice high-fat, high-sucrose diet (choice group) for 3 wk (cycling rats) or for 3 wk before conception and throughout pregnancy (pregnant rats)

Chow
Choice
ACh ACh + l-NAME ACh ACh + l-NAME
Cycling rats
Mesenteric
    pEC50 7.80 ± 0.17 (6) ND 7.73 ± 0.09 (7) ND
    Emax 99.8 ± 0.2* (6) 48.6 ± 19.7 (6) 97.1 ± 1.2 (7) 34.8 ± 15.2 (7)
Uterine
    pEC50 6.88 ± 0.04 (7) ND 7.10 ± 0.05§ (7) ND
    Emax 92.9 ± 3.0* (7) 25.1 ± 8.9 (7) 92.0 ± 2.3 (7) 30.5 ± 11.2
Pregnant rats
Mesenteric
    pEC50 7.80 ± 0.17 (6) ND 7.73 ± 0.09 (7) ND
    Emax 98.0 ± 1.3 (9) 80.1 ± 8.2 (9) 97.2 ± 1.3* (8) 72.3 ± 9.0 (8)
Uterine
    pEC50 7.22 ± 0.15 (8) ND 7.41 ± 0.09 (7) ND
    Emax 92.3 ± 1.9* (8) 7.8 ± 6.7 (8) 89.0 ± 3.8* (7) 42.7 ± 8.6 (7)

Data are means ± SE; number of rats per group is given in parentheses. ACh, acetylcholine; l-NAME, NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester; pEC50, concentration of agonist that gives a response halfway between top and bottom (plateaus in sigmoidal curves); Emax, maximum response to agonist. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ND, not determined;

*

P ≤ 0.04 vs. chow ACh + l-NAME, choice ACh + l-NAME;

P ≤ 0.04 vs. choice ACh + l-NAME, chow ACh + l-NAME;

P ≤ 0.04 vs. chow ACh, choice ACh;

§

P < 0.007.