Deng 2010.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial, China Parallel group design |
|
| Participants | 68 participants diagnosed with moderate or severe chronic hepatitis B according to Chinese guidelines 2000 (CMA 2001). Serum TBIL > 34.2 μmol/L. Male:female: 55:13 Mean age: 40.2 years (experimental group), 47.5 years (control group) Exclusion criteria: with obvious heart, brain, kidney, or nervous system diseases; extrahepatic obstructive jaundice verified by colour ultrasound or CT tests. |
|
| Interventions |
Experimental intervention: matrine glucose solution, 250 mL, once daily, intravenous infusion, 1 month (n = 36) Control intervention: yin zhi huang injection, 30 mL, with 5% glucose solution 250 mL, once daily, intravenous infusion, 1 month (n = 32) Cointervention: diammonium glycyrrhizinate injection, 150 mg, once a day, intravenous injection; and reduced glutathione, 250 mL, once daily, intravenous infusion, 1 month Post‐treatment follow‐up: no follow‐up |
|
| Outcomes | Clinical symptoms; liver (function) tests (ALT, AST, TBIL) | |
| Notes |
Study dates: May 2007 to May 2008 Funding information: author did not provide any information on clinical study support or sponsorship. Notes: we contacted the authors on 29 June 2018 by telephone and received no reply. |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Used random number table to generate random sequence |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The number of participants included in the analysis was equal to the number of participants randomised; no missing data. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | We could not obtain the protocol, and author did not report any data on the primary outcomes. |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Paper only had 1 author, and author did not mention any acknowledgements. If the trial was conducted by a single person, there would be potential risks of bias in every step. |