Skip to main content
. 2008 May 10;26(14):2364–2372. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6580

Table 1.

Univariate Proportional Hazards Models for Prediction of DFS and OS

Factor DFS
OS
Comparison
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
ErbB-2 by IHC (dichotomous) 1.19 0.96 to 1.46 .11 1.31 1.04 to 1.64 .021* Positive v negative
    ≥ 50% v < 50%
ERBB-2 by FISH (dichotomous) 1.32 0.95 to 1.83 .093 1.51 1.07 to 2.14 .019* Positive v negative
    < 2.0 v ≥ 2.0
PN2A (dichotomous) 1.33 1.03 to 1.73 .032* 1.30 0.97 to 1.73 0.078 Positive v negative
    > 0% v 0%
ErbB-2/PN2A .09 .14
     ErbB-2 = 0% 1.00 1.00
     ErbB-2 low/PN2A− 0.99 0.78 to 1.24 0.97 0.75 to 1.26
     ErbB-2 low/PN2A+ 1.83 1.08 to 3.10 1.47 0.80 to 2.70
     ErbB-2 high/PN2A− 1.16 0.89 to 1.53 1.31 0.97 to 1.75
     ErbB2 high/PN2A+ 1.26 0.93 to 1.72 1.32 0.94 to 1.85

NOTE. For ErbB-2 by IHC, n = 910; for ERBB-2 by FISH, n = 500.

Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; IHC, immunohistochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization.

*

Statistically significant at P < .05.

Compare each following row to first row (ie, ErbB-2 = 0%).