Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 10;34(2):324–332. doi: 10.1002/gps.5024

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants who were included final analysis and ANOVA results (n = 72)

FG (n = 25) NFG (n = 25) CG (n = 22) P Value MC
Age (mean ± SD) Years 76.8 ± 5.4 76.5 ± 4.6 77.0 ± 3.5 0.926
Gender (male/female) N 7/18 5/20 6/16 0.773
Education (mean ± SD) Years 13.0 ± 2.2 11.6 ± 2.3 13.0 ± 2.4 0.444
TMIG index (mean ± SD) Score (0‐13) 11.7 ± 1.5 11.3 ± 1.3 11.6 ± 1.4 0.379
WHO‐5‐J (mean ± SD) Score (0‐25) 15.9 ± 5.1 16.9 ± 2.9 18.3 ± 2.8 0.137
MMSE‐J (mean ± SD) Score (0‐30) 28.2 ± 1.6 28.8 ± 1.0 28.3 ± 1.5 0.076
MoCA‐J (mean ± SD) Score (0‐30) 25.4 ± 2.7 25.6 ± 2.8 24.9 ± 3.0 0.036* NFG > CG**

Abbreviations: ANOVA, Analysis of variance; CG, Active control group; FG, Face‐to‐face group; MC, Multiple comparison; MMSE, Mini‐Mental State Examination‐Japanese; MoCA‐J, Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment; N, Number of participants; NFG, Non‐face‐to‐face group; SD, Standard deviation; TMIG Index, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index; WHO‐5‐J, Japanese version of the World Health Organization‐Five Well‐Being Index.

Comparing the three groups:

*

P < .05.

Bonferroni method for multiple comparisons:

**

P < .016 NFG vs CG.