Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 5;53(6):605–615. doi: 10.1111/medu.13811

Table 2.

Model of mentoring approaches and conflicts of roles in a multiple‐role mentoring system

Predominant mentoring approaches Mentor–menteerelationship Characteristic factors Conflict of roles
Mentors’ strategies Primary focus on mentoring Extent of students’ agency Perception of the feedback and assessment system
Empowering Partnership Reflective, mirroring student's behaviour A holistic approach to the development of students’ personal and professional identity The student is given considerable agency by the mentor A support in the mentor role No: different roles are considered to be a surplus
Checking Instrumental Observe, ticking boxes A check of what the assessment programme prescribes and whether performance standards are met The student is granted full agency by the mentor A purpose in itself No: different roles are considered to be a surplus
Directing Faculty‐centred Authoritative, telling students what to do Give direction on what it takes to become and be a doctor The student is given a low degree of agency, whereas the mentor steers and has a high degree of agency A defective system that is not trusted Yes: mentors feel uncomfortable advising on a student's level