Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;234(8):13994–14006. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28086

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis for IL‐6 on clinical outcome

Covariate TTFT a PFS a
HR; 95% CI p Value HR; 95% CI p Value
Stage 2.706 (1.257–5.823) 0.011 3.231 (1.386–7.536) 0.007
IL‐6 2.361 (1.081–5.160) 0.031 2.171 (0.922–5.109) 0.076
17p11q 1.409 (0.661–3.001) 0.374 1.382 (0.597–3.199) 0.450
IL‐6 2.543 (1.198–5.398) 0.015 2.599 (1.134–5.957) 0.024
ZAP‐70 2.394 (0.977–5.868) 0.056 2.134 (0.720–6.326) 0.172
IL‐6 2.885 (1.141–7.296) 0.025 2.957 (0.932–9.384) 0.066
CD38 1.517 (0.742–3.101) 0.254 1.788 (0.806–3.969) 0.153
IL‐6 3.091 (1.488–6.421) 0.002 2.886 (1.288–6.466) 0.010

Note. Effect of IL‐6 on clinical outcome was adjusted individually by each risk factor.

CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; IL‐6: interleukin 6; PFS: progression‐free survival; TTFT: shorter time to first time treatment; ZAP‐70: zeta‐associated protein‐70.

a

Number of cases = 71.