Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 11;80(1):98–105. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21498

Table 1.

Summary of prospective studies reporting on bedaquiline‐containing treatment for MDR‐TB patients

Corresponding author, countries, publication year No. of cases in efficacy assessment/no. of cases in the study No. (%) pre‐XDR‐TB cases No. (%) XDR‐TB cases Regimen design No. (%) of cases taking LZD No. (%) cases HIV‐infected The median time to culture conversion (days) Sputum culture conversion at week 24 Treatment outcome evaluation
Andreas H. Diacon, South Africa, 2012 21/23 2 (8.7%) 0 (0%) A background regimen plus 8‐week BDQ or placebo. 0 (0%) 3 (13%) 78 17/21 (81%) 11 (51%) had favorable outcome.
Brian Dannemann, multi‐countrya, 2014 66/80 15 (28%) 0 (0%) A background regimen plus 24‐week BDQ or placebo. 0 (0%) 5 (8%) 83 52/66 (79%) 38 (58%) had favorable outcome.
Alexander S. Pym1, multi‐countryb, 2017 205/233 44 (21%) 37 (18%) A background regimen plus 24‐week BDQ. 34 (14%) 0 (0%) 57 163/205 (79%) 128 (62%) had favorable outcome.
Norbert Ndjeka, South Korea, 2015 41/91 41 (45%) 33 (36%) An optimized regimen of at least three drugs plus BDQ for 24 weeks. 63 (69%) 54 (59%) 45 33/48 (69%) Not specified. Only early efficacy assessment.
Keertan Dheda, South Africa, 2018 68/272 0 (0%) 272 (100%) A DST‐individualized regimen of a median of five effective drugs. 55 (81%) 35 (51%) Not specified 46/68 (68%) 45 (66%) had favorable outcome.

MDR‐TB = multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis; pre‐XDR‐TB = pre‐extensively drug‐resistant tuberculosis; XDR‐TB = extensively drug‐resistant tuberculosis; LZD = linezolid; BDQ = bedaquiline; DST = Drug susceptibility testing.

a

This study enrolled patients from eight countries in Brazil, India, Latvia, Peru, the Philippines, Russia, South Africa, and Thailand.

b

This study enrolled patients from 11 countries in China, South Korea, Estonia, Latvia, Turkey, Ukraine, Peru, the Philippines, Russia, South Africa, and Thailand.