Table 1.
Study | N | Decision/Diagnose | Inputs | Outcomes | TRIPOD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Roach et al. 1994)[25] | 282 | Low or high risk of LN involvement | PSA,GS, Clinical stage | P LN involvement | 79% |
| |||||
(Diaz et al. 1994)[26] | 217 | Low or high risk of SV involvement | PSA, GS | P SV involvement | 69% |
| |||||
(D'Amico et al. 1998)[27] | 1872 | Patient risk group | PSA, GS, Clinical stage | 5-year PSA outcome | 72% |
| |||||
(Chang et al. 1999)[28] | 43 | Localized vs Advanced PCa | PSA, GS, TRUS, DRE | P advanced PCa and P localized PCa | 65% |
| |||||
(Roach et al. 2000)[29] | 895 | Extracapsular extension | PSA, GS | Extracapsular extension risk | 92%∗∗ |
| |||||
(Lee et al. 2010)[30] | 1077 | Biopsy | Clinical∗, Imaging∗, PSA | P PCa | 86% |
| |||||
(Kim et al. 2011)[31] | 532 | Advanced PCa | TRUS, Clinical, PSA | P advanced PCa | 79% |
| |||||
(Shah et al. 2012)[32] | 31 | Location PCa | MRI image | Cancer probability map | 83% |
| |||||
(Mukai et al. 2013)[33] | 30773 | PSA test | Clinical | Recommendation | -∗∗∗ |
| |||||
(Sadoughi et al. 2014)[34] | 360 | PCa | PSA, Age | P PCa | 33% |
| |||||
(van Leeuwen et al. 2017)[35] | 591 | Significant PCa | Clinical, PSA, PIRADS, DRE | P significant PCa | 97% |
| |||||
(Tosoian, et al. 2017)[36] | 4459 | Pathological Stage | PSA, GS, Clinical stage | % likelihood of given stage | 83% |
Abbreviations. N: number of patients; P: probability; PCa: prostate cancer; PSA: prostate specific antigen; PIRADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; TRUS: transrectal ultrasound scan; LN: lymph node; GS: Gleason score; SV: seminal vesicles; TRIPOD: adherence to the TRIPOD statement; DRE: digital rectal examination.
∗Clinical, imaging, and tumor parameters.
∗∗Abstract only.
∗∗∗No development or validation of mDSS: no TRIPOD evaluation possible.