Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 6;2019:4961768. doi: 10.1155/2019/4961768

Table 1.

Overview of diagnosis support systems.

Study N Decision/Diagnose Inputs Outcomes TRIPOD
(Roach et al. 1994)[25] 282 Low or high risk of LN involvement PSA,GS, Clinical stage P LN involvement 79%

(Diaz et al. 1994)[26] 217 Low or high risk of SV involvement PSA, GS P SV involvement 69%

(D'Amico et al. 1998)[27] 1872 Patient risk group PSA, GS, Clinical stage 5-year PSA outcome 72%

(Chang et al. 1999)[28] 43 Localized vs Advanced PCa PSA, GS, TRUS, DRE P advanced PCa and P localized PCa 65%

(Roach et al. 2000)[29] 895 Extracapsular extension PSA, GS Extracapsular extension risk 92%∗∗

(Lee et al. 2010)[30] 1077 Biopsy Clinical, Imaging, PSA P PCa 86%

(Kim et al. 2011)[31] 532 Advanced PCa TRUS, Clinical, PSA P advanced PCa 79%

(Shah et al. 2012)[32] 31 Location PCa MRI image Cancer probability map 83%

(Mukai et al. 2013)[33] 30773 PSA test Clinical Recommendation -∗∗∗

(Sadoughi et al. 2014)[34] 360 PCa PSA, Age P PCa 33%

(van Leeuwen et al. 2017)[35] 591 Significant PCa Clinical, PSA, PIRADS, DRE P significant PCa 97%

(Tosoian, et al. 2017)[36] 4459 Pathological Stage PSA, GS, Clinical stage % likelihood of given stage 83%

Abbreviations. N: number of patients; P: probability; PCa: prostate cancer; PSA: prostate specific antigen; PIRADS: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; TRUS: transrectal ultrasound scan; LN: lymph node; GS: Gleason score; SV: seminal vesicles; TRIPOD: adherence to the TRIPOD statement; DRE: digital rectal examination.

Clinical, imaging, and tumor parameters.

∗∗Abstract only.

∗∗∗No development or validation of mDSS: no TRIPOD evaluation possible.