Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 20;28(6):863–873. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7318

Table 3.

Comparing After-Visit Patient Report of Provider Communication About Intimate Partner Violence, Reproductive Coercion, Safety Cards, and Sexually Transmitted Infections Between Trauma-Informed Personalized Scripts (TIPS)-Plus and TIPS-Basic

  Mean summary score (95% CI)  
Outcome (summary score) TIPS-Plus, n = 114 TIPS-Basic, n = 126 pa
Discussion of IPV, RC, and safety card (3 summary items)b 2.37 (2.19–2.55) 2.39 (2.21–2.57) 0.6349
IPV discussion (3 items) 1.86 (1.63–2.08) 2.04 (1.84–2.24) 0.2224
RC discussion (6 items) 2.72 (2.36–3.09) 2.66 (2.31–3.00) 0.7706
Safety card discussion (4 items) 2.66 (2.36–2.95) 2.72 (2.45–2.99) 0.7805
STI discussion (2 items)c 1.19 (0.85–1.53) 1.57 (1.26–1.88) 0.0748
IPV/RC disclosure 25.0% (20/80) 20.2% (19/94) 0.4500d
a

Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test, unless otherwise indicated.

b

Any discussion: summary score of any IPV discussion, any RC discussion, and any safety card discussion.

c

Responses from patients who reported a sexually transmitted infection diagnosis at clinic visit (n = 42; 21 = TIPS-Plus and 21 = TIPS-Basic).

d

Disclosure rates, compared by chi-square.

TIPS, Trauma-Informed Personalized Scripts; CI, confidence interval