Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;16(6):e1002839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002839

Table 3. AEs by treatment regimen and infection status.

Drug Regimen Mf Test Resultsa Total Number of People Treated and Assessed for AEs and for Mf Any AE
n (%)
Grade 1
n (%)
Grade 2
n (%)
Grade 3
n (%)
Grade 4 n (%) SAE
n (%)
DA Mf(−) 11,262 1,287 (11.4) 1,176 (10.4) 99 (0.9) 9 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 3 (0.0)
Mf(+) 524 134 (25.6) 124 (23.7) 7 (1.3) 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.4)
Total 11,786 1,421 (12.1) 1,300 (11.0) 106 (0.9) 10 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 5 (0.0)
IDA Mf(−) 13,617 1,464 (10.8) 1,340 (9.8) 113 (0.8) 10 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.0)
Mf(+) 612 241 (39.4) 205 (33.5) 35 (5.7) 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Total 14,229 1,705 (12.0) 1,545 (10.9) 148 (1.0) 11 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.0)

AEs after IDA 12% versus 12.1% after DA, adjusted odds ratio for IDA versus DA 1.15, 95% CI 0.87–1.52, P = 0.316). See Statistical Methods for details.

aThis table does not include data for 17 persons with missing Mf values who were assessed for AEs after treatment.

Abbreviations: (−), negative results; (+), positive results; AE, adverse event; DA, double-drug therapy (diethylcarbamazine, albendazole); IDA, triple-drug therapy (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, albendazole); Mf, microfilaremia; SAE, serious AE.